FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030  
1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   >>   >|  
h stands conceded. Thanking your honor for the great patience with which you have listened to my too extended remarks, I submit the legal questions which the case involves for your honor's consideration. District Attorney Crowley followed Judge Selden with an argument two hours in length. He stated that, in his view, the case simply presented questions of law, and that his argument, therefore, would be addressed strictly to the court, leaving the court to give such instructions to the jury upon the facts as he might deem proper. He contended that the right to vote was not included in "privileges and immunities," and was only given by State laws and State constitutions. He concluded his argument by saying that an honest mistake of the facts may sometimes excuse, but a mistake of the law never. The COURT addressed the jury as follows: _Gentlemen of the Jury:_ I have given this case such consideration as I have been able to, and, that there might be no misapprehension about my views, I have made a brief statement in writing. The defendant is indicted under the act of Congress of 1870, for having voted for Representatives in Congress in November, 1872. Among other things, that Act makes it an offense for any person knowingly to vote for such Representatives without having a right to vote. It is charged that the defendant thus voted, she not having a right to vote because she is a woman. The defendant insists that she has a right to vote; that the provision of the Constitution of this State limiting the right to vote to persons of the male sex is in violation of the XIV. Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, and is void. The XIII., XIV., and XV. Amendments were designed mainly for the protection of the newly emancipated negroes, but full effect must nevertheless be given to the language employed. The XIII. Amendment provided that neither slavery nor involuntary servitude should longer exist in the United States. If honestly received and fairly applied, this provision would have been enough to guard the rights of the colored race. In some States it was attempted to be evaded by enactments cruel and oppressive in their nature; as that colored persons were forbidden to appear in the towns except in a menial capacity; that they should reside on and cultivate the soil
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030  
1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

argument

 

States

 
defendant
 

Representatives

 

addressed

 

Congress

 

provision

 

Amendment

 

United

 

mistake


persons

 

Constitution

 

questions

 

colored

 

consideration

 

violation

 
limiting
 

menial

 

longer

 

nature


forbidden

 

capacity

 

charged

 

cultivate

 
knowingly
 

insists

 

honestly

 
reside
 

Amendments

 
applied

provided
 
employed
 

language

 

rights

 

person

 

involuntary

 

slavery

 
attempted
 
fairly
 

protection


designed

 
received
 
oppressive
 

enactments

 

evaded

 

effect

 
emancipated
 

negroes

 

servitude

 

misapprehension