FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055  
1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   >>   >|  
you presented yourself at the polls on election day? _A._ Mr. Hall decidedly objected-- Mr. CROWLEY: I submit to the Court that unless the counsel expects to change the version given by the other witnesses, it is not necessary to take up time. The COURT: As a matter of discretion, I don't see how it will be any benefit. It was fully related by the others, and doubtless correctly. Mr. CROWLEY: It is not disputed. The WITNESS: I would like to say, if I might be allowed by the Court, that the general impression that I swore I was a male citizen, is an erroneous one. Mr. VAN VOORHIS: You took the two oaths there, did you? _A._ Yes, sir. The COURT: You presented yourself as a female, claiming that you had a right to vote? _A._ I presented myself not as a female at all, sir; I presented myself as a citizen of the United States. I was called to the United States ballot-box by the XIV. Amendment, not as a female, but as a citizen, and I went there. Miss Anthony's emphatic reply and intimation that, although a condemned criminal for having voted, she still believed in her citizenship as securing that right to her, closed the lips of the Court, and she was summarily dismissed from the witness-box, and the case rested. Mr. Van Voorhis addressed the Court at some length, submitting that there was no ground whatever to charge these defendants (the Inspectors) with any criminal offense, 1. Because the women who voted were legal voters. 2. Because they were challenged and took the oaths which the statute requires of Electors, and the Inspectors had no right, after such oath, to reject their votes. 3. Because no malice is shown. Whether the women were entitled to have their names registered and to vote, or not, the defendants believed they had such right, and acted in good faith, according to their best judgment, in allowing the registry of their names--and in receiving their votes--and whether they decided right or wrong in point of law, they are not guilty of any criminal offense. These points were amplified by the counsel at some length, who closed by saying, "The defendants should be discharged by the Court." Mr. Crowley then rose to make his argument, when the Court said: The COURT: I don't think it is necessary for you to spend time in argument, Mr.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055  
1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

presented

 

female

 
defendants
 

criminal

 

citizen

 

Because

 

Inspectors

 

offense

 

believed

 

closed


States

 

United

 

length

 

counsel

 

CROWLEY

 

argument

 
Crowley
 

discharged

 

points

 

amplified


registered

 

submitting

 

Voorhis

 

addressed

 
ground
 

charge

 

voters

 
registry
 

receiving

 
Electors

allowing
 
judgment
 

reject

 

requires

 

decided

 

guilty

 

challenged

 
Whether
 
statute
 

entitled


malice

 
related
 
benefit
 

discretion

 

doubtless

 

correctly

 
allowed
 

disputed

 

WITNESS

 

matter