FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089   1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099   1100   1101   1102   1103   1104   1105  
1106   1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   1114   1115   1116   1117   1118   1119   1120   1121   1122   1123   1124   1125   1126   1127   1128   1129   1130   >>   >|  
alleged offenses in advance of trial, for offenses unknown to the law, and by bill of attainder and _ex post facto enactments_, etc.--(Green _vs._ Shumway, 36 Howard's Practice Rep., pp. 7, 8.) On the same subject, we will next quote from a decision by the Supreme Court of Nevada: LEWIS, C. J.--The form of the law by which an individual is deprived of a constitutional right is immaterial. The test of its constitutionality is, whether it operates to deprive any person of a right guaranteed or given to him by the Constitution. If it does, it is a nullity, whatever may be its form. Surely a law which deprives a person of a right, by requiring him to take an oath which he can not take, is no less objectionable than one depriving him of such right in direct terms. To make the enjoyment of a right depend upon an impossible condition, or upon the doing of that which can not legally be done, is equivalent to an absolute denial of the right under any condition. The effect, and not the language of the law, in such case, must determine its constitutionality. It would not be doubted for a moment that a law expressly denying the elective franchise to any person upon whom the Constitution confers it would be unconstitutional. Why, then, is a law less objectionable which, although not expressly and directly, yet no less certainly denies the right, etc.--(Davies _vs._ McKeeby, 5 Nevada Rep. 7,371.) We quote next from a Tennessee case: The elective franchise is a right which the law protects and enforces as jealously as it does property in chattels or lands. It matters not by what name it is designated--the right to vote, the elective franchise, or the privilege of the elective franchise--the person who, under the Constitution and laws of the State is entitled to it, has a property in it, which the law maintains and vindicates as vigorously as it does any right of any kind which men may have and enjoy. The rules of law which guard against deprivation or injury, the rights of persons in corporeal properties, are alike and equally applicable to the elective franchise, and
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089   1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099   1100   1101   1102   1103   1104   1105  
1106   1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   1114   1115   1116   1117   1118   1119   1120   1121   1122   1123   1124   1125   1126   1127   1128   1129   1130   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

elective

 
franchise
 

person

 

Constitution

 

offenses

 

objectionable

 

condition

 

constitutionality

 

Nevada

 

property


expressly

 

denies

 

Tennessee

 

McKeeby

 

Davies

 

unconstitutional

 

denying

 

advance

 

moment

 

doubted


determine

 

confers

 

directly

 

chattels

 

deprivation

 

injury

 

rights

 

equally

 
applicable
 

properties


persons

 

corporeal

 
vigorously
 

vindicates

 

matters

 

enforces

 

alleged

 

jealously

 

designated

 

entitled


maintains

 

privilege

 
protects
 

constitutional

 

immaterial

 
deprived
 

Shumway

 

individual

 

guaranteed

 
enactments