FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083  
1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089   1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099   1100   1101   1102   1103   1104   1105   1106   1107   1108   >>   >|  
mid the hurry and confusion of a _nisiprius_ term; and the wrong Miss Anthony has suffered ought to be charged to the vicious system which denies to those convicted of offenses against the laws of the United States a hearing before the court of last resort--a defect it is equally within the power and the duty of Congress speedily to remedy. MATT H. CARPENTER. Mr. Tremaine, from the House Judiciary Committee, reported adversely on the prayer of Miss Anthony's Petition, and Benjamin F. Butler favorably. Forty-third Congress, 1st Session, House of Representatives, Report No. 608, Susan B. Anthony, May 25, 1874, recommitted to the Committee on the Judiciary and ordered to be printed. Mr. B. F. BUTLER, from the Committee on the Judiciary, submitted the following Report to accompany bill H. R. 3492: _The Committee on the Judiciary, to whom was referred the memorial of Susan B. Anthony, of the city of Rochester, in the State of New York, praying that a fine alleged to have been unjustly imposed on the petitioner by a judgment of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York, may be remitted, having considered the prayer of the petitioner and the statement of facts set forth in the memorial, respectfully beg leave to report_: * * * * * Are these positions of the petitioner well founded? By necessary division there arise two questions: First, has Congress any power, or is there any precedent for entertaining such petition for such purpose? And, secondly, are the acts and order of the judge in accordance with the law of the land, and not in derogation of the right of the citizen to trial by jury at common law as guaranteed by the Constitution, as known and practiced in the courts of the United States? If the first should be answered in the negative, of course the committee and the House would be spared the discussion of the second. It seems to your committee that there are two very noted and historical cases which may form the precedents for this application, and favorable action thereon by Congress--in the proceeding concerning the fines imposed by the courts on Matthew Lyon and General Jackson. Lyon was fined by a Unit
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083  
1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089   1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099   1100   1101   1102   1103   1104   1105   1106   1107   1108   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Congress

 
Committee
 

Judiciary

 

Anthony

 

petitioner

 

United

 

States

 

courts

 

committee

 

prayer


Report

 

memorial

 

imposed

 

respectfully

 

report

 

accordance

 

purpose

 

petition

 

division

 

precedent


founded

 

entertaining

 

questions

 

positions

 

practiced

 

precedents

 

application

 

historical

 
favorable
 

action


General

 

Jackson

 
Matthew
 

thereon

 

proceeding

 

common

 

guaranteed

 

Constitution

 

derogation

 

citizen


spared

 

discussion

 
negative
 

answered

 

alleged

 
speedily
 

remedy

 

equally

 

resort

 
defect