FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066  
1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089   1090   1091   >>   >|  
its, a knowledge in fact, not a knowledge falsely imputed by law to a party not possessing it in fact, as the judge in this case has held. Crimes can not, either in law or in morals, be established by judicial falsehood. If there be any crime in the case, your petitioner humbly insists it is to be found in such an adjudication. To the decision of the judge upon the question of the right of your petitioner to vote, she makes no complaint. It was a question properly belonging to the court to decide, was fully and fairly submitted to the judge, and of his decision, whether right or wrong, your petitioner is well aware she can not here complain. But in regard to her conviction of crime, which she insists, for the reasons above given, was in violation of the principles of the common law, of common morality, of the statute under which she was charged, and of the Constitution--a crime of which she was as innocent as the judge by whom she was convicted--she respectfully asks, inasmuch as the law has provided no means of reviewing the decisions of the judge, or of correcting his errors, that the fine imposed upon your petitioner be remitted, as an expression of the sense of this high tribunal that her conviction was unjust. Dated January 12, 1874. SUSAN B. ANTHONY. In the Senate of the United States, June 20, 1874, Mr. Edmunds submitted the following report: _The Committee on the Judiciary, to whom was referred the bill_ (S. 391) _to enable Susan B. Anthony to pay a fine imposed upon her by the District Court for the Northern District of New York, and a petition praying for the remission of said fine, report:_ That they are not satisfied that the action of the Court was such as represented in the petition, and that, if it were so, the Senate could not legally take any action in the premises, and move that the Committee be discharged from the further consideration of the petition, and that the bill be postponed indefinitely. Mr. Carpenter asked, and obtained, leave of the Senate to present the following as the views of the minority: _The Committee on the Judiciary, to whom was referred the memorial of_ SUSAN B. ANTHONY, _praying to be relieved from a certain judgment, rendered against her by the Circuit Court of the Un
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066  
1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089   1090   1091   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

petitioner

 
petition
 

Committee

 

Senate

 

referred

 

Judiciary

 

common

 

imposed

 

action

 

praying


conviction

 

District

 

knowledge

 

submitted

 

report

 

insists

 

ANTHONY

 

decision

 

question

 

States


United

 

remission

 

enable

 

Edmunds

 

Anthony

 

Northern

 

present

 

minority

 
obtained
 

Carpenter


memorial

 

relieved

 
Circuit
 

rendered

 

judgment

 

indefinitely

 

postponed

 

falsely

 

represented

 

satisfied


legally

 

consideration

 
discharged
 

premises

 

expression

 
fairly
 

decide

 

properly

 

belonging

 
regard