FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   1017  
1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042   >>   >|  
olly untouched, by my construction of it. Neither do I think the position tenable which has been taken by one tribunal, to which the consideration of this subject was presented, that the constitutional provision does not execute itself. The provisions on which we rely were negative merely, and were designed to nullify existing as well as any future State legislation interfering with our rights. This result was accomplished by the constitution itself. Undoubtedly before we could exercise our right, it was necessary that there should be a time and place appointed for holding the election and proper officers to hold it, with suitable arrangements for receiving and counting the votes. All this was properly done by existing laws, and our right being made complete by the Constitution, no further legislation was required in our behalf. When the State officers attempted to interpose between us and the ballot-box the State Constitution or State law, whether ancient or recent, abridging or denying our equal right to vote with other citizens, we had but to refer to the United States Constitution, prohibiting the States from enforcing any such constitutional provision or law, and our rights were complete; we needed neither Congressional nor State legislation in aid of them. The opinion of Mr. Justice Bradley, in a case in the United States Circuit Court in New Orleans (1 Abb. U. S. Rep., 402) would seem to be decisive of this question, although the right involved in that case was not that of the elective franchise. The learned Justice says: It was very ably contended on the part of the defendants that the XIV. Amendment was intended only to secure to all citizens equal capacities before the law. That was at first our view of it. But it does not so read. The language is: "No State shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States." What are the privileges and immunities of citizens? Are they capacities merely? Are they not also rights? Senator Carpenter, who took part in the discussion of the XIV. Amendment in the Senate, and aided in its passage, says: The XIV. Amendment executes itself in every State of the Union.... It is thus the will of the United States in every
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   1017  
1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 
United
 

citizens

 

rights

 

legislation

 

Amendment

 

Constitution

 

complete

 

officers

 

existing


capacities

 

constitutional

 

provision

 

Justice

 

privileges

 

immunities

 

Congressional

 

decisive

 

involved

 

needed


question

 

elective

 

Orleans

 

Bradley

 

Circuit

 

opinion

 

Carpenter

 

Senator

 
abridge
 

discussion


Senate

 

executes

 
passage
 

intended

 

secure

 

defendants

 

contended

 

learned

 

language

 

enforcing


franchise

 

interpose

 
future
 

interfering

 

nullify

 
negative
 

designed

 

result

 

accomplished

 
exercise