FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807  
808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   >>   >|  
te the importance which from early times must have attached to Sarhad as the highest place of permanent occupation on the direct route leading from the Oxus to the Tarim Basin. Here was the last point where caravans coming from the Bactrian side with the products of the Far West and of India could provision themselves for crossing that high tract of wilderness 'called Pamier' of which old Marco Polo rightly tells us: 'You ride across it ...' And as I looked south towards the snow-covered saddle of the Baroghil, the route I had followed myself, it was equally easy to realize why Kao Hsien-chih's strategy had, after the successful crossing of the Pamirs, made the three columns of his Chinese Army concentrate upon the stronghold of Lien-yuen, opposite the present Sarhad. Here was the base from which Yasin could be invaded and the Tibetans ousted from their hold upon the straight route to the Indus." XXXII., p. 174. "The note connecting Hiuan Tsang's Kieh sha with Kashgar is probably based upon an error of the old translators, for the Sita River was in the Pamir region, and _K'a sha_ was one of the names of Kasanna, or Kieh-shwang-na, in the Oxus region." (E.H. PARKER, _Asiatic Quart. Rev._, Jan., 1904, p. 143.) XXXII., I. p. 173; II. p. 593. PAONANO PAO. Cf. _The Name Kushan_, by J.F. Fleet, _Jour. Roy. As. Soc._, April, 1914, pp. 374-9; _The Shaonano Shao Coin Legend;_ and a Note on the name Kushan by J. Allan, Ibid., pp. 403-411. PAONANO PAO. Von Joh. Kirste. (_Wiener Zeit. f. d. Kunde d. Morg._, II., 1888, pp. 237-244.) XXXII., p. 174. YUE CHI. "The old statement is repeated that the Yueeh Chi, or Indo-Scyths (i.e. the Eptals), 'are said to have been of Tibetan origin.' A long account of this people was given in the _Asiatic Quart. Rev._ for July, 1902. It seems much more likely that they were a branch of the Hiung-nu or Turks. Albiruni's 'report' that they were of Tibetan origin is probably founded on the Chinese statement that some of their ways were like Tibetan ways, and that polyandry existed amongst them; also that they fled from the Hiung-nu westwards along the _north edge_ of the Tibetan territory, and some of them took service as Tibetan officials." (E.H. PARKER, _Asiatic Quart. Rev._, Jan., 1904, p. 143.) XXXII., pp. 178-179. BOLOR. We read in the _Tarikh-i-Rashidi_ of Mirza Haidar (Notes by Ney Elias; translated by E.D. Ross, 1895), p. 135, that Sultan Said Khan, son of Mansur Khan,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807  
808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Tibetan

 

Asiatic

 

Sarhad

 

origin

 

statement

 

Kushan

 
region
 
PARKER
 

Chinese

 
PAONANO

crossing
 

repeated

 
Shaonano
 

Legend

 

Kirste

 

Wiener

 
Tarikh
 
officials
 

service

 

westwards


territory

 
Rashidi
 

Sultan

 

Mansur

 
Haidar
 

translated

 

account

 
people
 
Scyths
 

Eptals


founded

 

report

 

polyandry

 

existed

 

Albiruni

 

branch

 

rightly

 

wilderness

 

called

 

Pamier


Baroghil

 

equally

 

saddle

 

covered

 

looked

 
provision
 
permanent
 

occupation

 
direct
 

leading