FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2442   2443   2444   2445   2446   2447   2448   2449   2450   2451   2452   2453   2454   2455   2456   2457   2458   2459   2460   2461   2462   2463   2464   2465   2466  
2467   2468   2469   2470   2471   2472   2473   2474   2475   2476   2477   2478   2479   2480   2481   2482   2483   2484   2485   2486   2487   2488   2489   2490   2491   >>   >|  
idea which this participle [e.g. '_tearing_'] really expresses, is simply that of the _continuance_ of an action in an _incomplete_ or _unfinished_ state. The action may belong to time _present_, to time _past_, or to time _future_. The participle which denotes the _completion_ of an action, as _torn_, is called the _perfect_ participle; because it represents the action as _perfect_ or _finished_."--_Barnard's Analytic Gram._, p. 51. Emmons stealthily copies from my Institutes as many as ten lines in defence of the term '_Imperfect_' and yet, in his conjugations, he calls the participle in _ing_, "_Present_." This seems inconsistent. See his "_Grammatical Instructer_," p. 61. [304] "The ancient termination (from the Anglo-Saxon) was _and_; as, 'His _schynand_ sword.' Douglas. And sometimes _ende_; as, 'She, between the deth and life, _Swounende_ lay full ofte.' Gower."--_W. Allen's Gram._, p. 88. "The present Participle, in Saxon, was formed by _ande, ende_, or _onde_; and, by cutting off the final _e_, it acquired a Substantive signification, and extended the idea to the agent: as, _alysende_, freeing, and _alysend_, a redeemer; _freonde_, loving or friendly, and _freond_, a lover or a friend."--_Booth's Introd. to Dict._, p. 75. [305] William B. Fowle, a modern disciple of Tooke, treats the subject of grammatical time rather more strangely than his master. Thus: "How many times or tenses have verbs? _Two_, [the] present and [the] _past_," To this he immediately adds in a note: "We _do not believe_ in a _past_ any more than a future tense of verbs."--_The True English Gram._, p. 30. So, between these two authors, our verbs will retain no tenses at all. Indeed, by his two tenses, Fowle only meant to recognize the two simple forms of an English verb. For he says, in an other place, "We repeat our conviction that no verb in itself expresses time of any sort."--_Ib._, p. 69, [306] "STONE'-BLIND," "STONE'-COLD," and "STONE'-DEAD," are given in Worcester's Dictionary, as compound _adjectives_; and this is perhaps their best classification; but, if I mistake not, they are usually accented quite as strongly on the latter syllable, as on the former, being spoken rather as two emphatic words. A similar example from Sigourney, "I saw an infant _marble cold_," is given by Frazee under this Note: "Adjectives sometimes belong to other adjectives; as, '_red hot_ iron.'"--_Improved Gram._, p. 141. But Webster himself, from whom t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2442   2443   2444   2445   2446   2447   2448   2449   2450   2451   2452   2453   2454   2455   2456   2457   2458   2459   2460   2461   2462   2463   2464   2465   2466  
2467   2468   2469   2470   2471   2472   2473   2474   2475   2476   2477   2478   2479   2480   2481   2482   2483   2484   2485   2486   2487   2488   2489   2490   2491   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

participle

 

action

 

tenses

 
present
 

expresses

 

adjectives

 

English

 

belong

 

perfect

 
future

conviction

 

repeat

 

immediately

 
authors
 

retain

 

recognize

 

simple

 

Indeed

 

marble

 

infant


Frazee

 
Sigourney
 
similar
 

Adjectives

 
Webster
 

Improved

 

emphatic

 

spoken

 

compound

 

classification


Dictionary

 
Worcester
 

syllable

 

strongly

 
mistake
 
accented
 

freond

 

Present

 
conjugations
 
defence

Imperfect

 

inconsistent

 

schynand

 

termination

 
ancient
 
Grammatical
 
Instructer
 

Institutes

 
unfinished
 

denotes