FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2438   2439   2440   2441   2442   2443   2444   2445   2446   2447   2448   2449   2450   2451   2452   2453   2454   2455   2456   2457   2458   2459   2460   2461   2462  
2463   2464   2465   2466   2467   2468   2469   2470   2471   2472   2473   2474   2475   2476   2477   2478   2479   2480   2481   2482   2483   2484   2485   2486   2487   >>   >|  
at_, and _thrive_, of the latter. [297] In the following example, there is a different phraseology, which seems not so well suited to the sense: "But we _must be aware_ of imagining, that we render style strong and expressive, by a constant and multiplied use of epithets"--_Blair's Rhet._, p. 287. Here, in stead of "_be aware_," the author should have said, "_beware_," or "_be ware_;" that is, be _wary_, or _cautious_; for _aware_ means _apprised_, or _informed_, a sense very different from the other. [298] Dr. Crombie contends that _must_ and _ought_ are used only in the present tense. (See his _Treatise_, p. 204.) In this he is wrong, especially with regard to the latter word. Lennie, and his copyist Bullions, adopt the same notion; but Murray, and many others, suppose them to "have both a present and [a] past signification." [299] Dr. Crombie says, "This Verb, as an auxiliary, is _inflexible_; thus we say, 'he _will_ go;' and 'he _wills to_ go.'"--_Treatise on Etym. and Syntax_, p. 203. He should have confined his remarks to the _familiar style_, in which all the auxiliaries, except _do, be_, and _have_, are inflexible. For, in the solemn style, we do not say, "Thou _will_ go," but, "Thou _wilt_ go." [300] "HAD-I-WIST. A proverbial expression, _Oh_ that I had known. _Gower_."--_Chalmers's Dict._, also _Webster's_. In this phrase, which is here needlessly compounded, and not very properly explained, we see _wist_ used as a perfect participle. But the word is obsolete. "_Had I wist_," is therefore an obsolete phrase, meaning. If I had known, or, "_O_ that I had known." [301] That is, passive verbs, as well as others, have three participles for each; so that, from one active-transitive root, there come _six_ participles--three active, and three passive. Those numerous grammarians who, like Lindley Murray, make passive verbs a distinct class, for the most part, very properly state the participles of a _verb_ to be "_three_;" but, to represent the two voices as modifications of one species of verbs, and then say, "The Participles are _three_," as many recent writers do, is manifestly absurd: because _two threes should be six_. Thus, for example, Dr. Bullions: "In English [,] the _transitive_ verb has always _two voices_, the Active and [the] Passive."--_Prin. of E. Gram._, p. 33. "The Participles are _three_, [:] the Present, the _Perfect_, and the _Compound Perfect_."--_Ib._, p. 57. Again: "_Transitive_ verbs ha
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2438   2439   2440   2441   2442   2443   2444   2445   2446   2447   2448   2449   2450   2451   2452   2453   2454   2455   2456   2457   2458   2459   2460   2461   2462  
2463   2464   2465   2466   2467   2468   2469   2470   2471   2472   2473   2474   2475   2476   2477   2478   2479   2480   2481   2482   2483   2484   2485   2486   2487   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
participles
 

passive

 

Crombie

 

present

 

Treatise

 

transitive

 

phrase

 

inflexible

 

obsolete

 

Murray


Bullions
 
active
 

properly

 

Participles

 

voices

 
Perfect
 

meaning

 
Compound
 
Transitive
 

Chalmers


Webster
 

explained

 
perfect
 

compounded

 

needlessly

 
participle
 

distinct

 

manifestly

 

writers

 

absurd


Lindley

 
species
 

modifications

 

represent

 

recent

 

Passive

 
Active
 

numerous

 

grammarians

 
threes

English

 
Present
 

cautious

 
apprised
 

beware

 

author

 

informed

 

contends

 

suited

 

imagining