FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317  
318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   >>   >|  
tween the _natural_ and the _social_ states. Civil society does not abridge our natural rights, but secures and protects them. She does not assume our right of self-defense,--she simply discharges the duty imposed by God to defend us. The original right is in those who compose the body politic, and not in any individual. Hence, civil society does not impair our natural liberty, as actually existing in a state of nature, or as it might therein exist; for, in such a state, there would be no real liberty, no real enjoyment of natural rights. Mr. Locke, as we have seen, defines the state of nature to be one of "perfect freedom." Why, then, should we leave it? "If man, in the state of nature, be so free," says he, "why will he part with his freedom? To which it is obvious to answer," he continues, "that though, in the state of nature, he hath such a right, _yet the enjoyment of it is very uncertain_, and constantly exposed to the invasion of others; for all being kings as much as he, every man his equal, and the greater part not strict observers of equity and justice, the enjoyment of the property he has in this state is very unsafe, very insecure. This makes him willing to quit a condition which, _however free, is full of fears and continual dangers_; and it is not without reason that he seeks out, and is willing to join in society with, others who are already united, or have a mind to unite, _for the mutual preservation of their lives, liberties, and estates_, which I call by the general name _property_."[140] What! can that be a state of perfect freedom which is subject to fears and perpetual dangers? In one word, can a reign of terror be the reign of liberty? It is evident, we think, that Locke has been betrayed into no little inaccuracy and confusion of thought from not having distinguished between rights and liberty. The truth seems to be that, in a state of nature, we would possess rights, but we could not enjoy them. That is to say, notwithstanding all our rights, we should be destitute of freedom or liberty. Society interposes the strong arm of the law to protect our rights, to secure us in the enjoyment of them. She delivers us from the alarms, the dangers, and the violence of the natural state. Hence, under God, she is the mother of our peace and joy, by whose sovereign rule anarchy is abolished and liberty established. Liberty and social law can never be dissevered. Liberty, robed in law, and radiant with love
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317  
318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

liberty

 

rights

 
nature
 

natural

 
freedom
 

enjoyment

 

society

 
dangers
 

property

 

social


perfect

 

Liberty

 

subject

 
general
 

perpetual

 

evident

 
mother
 

terror

 

abolished

 

united


mutual
 

sovereign

 
estates
 
liberties
 

preservation

 
protect
 

anarchy

 

possess

 

strong

 

dissevered


Society

 

notwithstanding

 

interposes

 
inaccuracy
 

established

 

confusion

 

destitute

 

betrayed

 

violence

 

delivers


distinguished

 

secure

 
radiant
 

thought

 

alarms

 

invasion

 

existing

 

impair

 

individual

 
defines