FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536  
537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   >>   >|  
i. [340:3] This is evident from the fact that Hippolytus is scarcely willing to recognise some of the Roman bishops, his contemporaries. But meanwhile both parties probably belonged to the same synod. Hippolytus seems to have been the leader of a formidable opposition. [341:1] Matt. xvi. 18. [341:2] See the Muratorian fragment in Bunsen's "Analecta Ante-Nicaena," i. 154, 155. This, according to Bunsen, is a fragment of a work of Hegesippus, and written about A.D. 165. Hippolytus, i. 314. [341:3] "Hermae Pastor," lib. iii. simil. ix. Sec. 12-14. "Petra haec.... Filius Dei est.... Quid est deinde haec turris? Haec, inquit, ecclesia est.... Demonstra mihi quare non in terra aedificatur haec turris, sed supra petram." [341:4] Tertullian, "De Praescrip." xxii. "Latuit aliquid Petrum aedificandae ecclesiae petram dictum?" Tertullian here speaks of the doctrine as already current. Even after he became a Montanist, he still adhered to the same interpretation--"Petrum solum invenio maritum, per socrum; monogamum praesumo per _ecclesiam, quae super illum, aedificata_ omnem gradum ordinis sui de monogamis erat collocatura."--_De Monogamia_, c. viii. Again, in another Montanist tract, he says--"Qualis es, evertens atque commutans manifestam domini intentionem personaliter hoc Petro conferentem? _Super te_, inquit, _aedificabo ecclesiam meam_."--_De Pudicitia_, c. xxi. See also "De Praescrip." c. xxii. According to Origen every believer, as well as Peter, is the foundation of the Church. "Contra Celsum," vi. 77. See also "Comment in Matthaeum xii.," Opera, tom. iii. p. 524, 526. [342:1] See this subject more fully explained in Period II. sec. iii. ch. viii. [343:1] Even the letters of Victor, which created such a sensation throughout the Church, are not forthcoming. See Pearson's "Vindiciae Ignatianae," pars 2, cap. 13, as to the spuriousness of those imputed to him. [343:2] They extend from Clement, who, according to some lists, was the first Pope, to Syricius, who was made Bishop of Rome A.D. 384. All candid writers, whether Romanists or Protestants, now acknowledge them to be forgeries. They may be found in "Binii Concilia." They made their appearance, for the first time, about the eighth century. [344:1] This is the date assigned to its erection by Bunsen, but Dr Wordsworth argues that it was erected earlier. [344:2] 22d August. [345:1] The first edition appeared at Oxford in 1851, exactly three hundred
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536  
537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Bunsen

 

Hippolytus

 

fragment

 
petram
 

Petrum

 

Montanist

 

ecclesiam

 
turris
 
Praescrip
 

Church


Tertullian

 

inquit

 

created

 

Pearson

 

Ignatianae

 
Vindiciae
 

sensation

 

forthcoming

 

Victor

 

Celsum


Contra

 

foundation

 

Matthaeum

 

Comment

 
Pudicitia
 

According

 

Origen

 
believer
 
explained
 

Period


subject
 

letters

 

Bishop

 

Wordsworth

 

argues

 

erection

 
eighth
 

century

 

assigned

 
erected

earlier

 

Oxford

 

hundred

 
appeared
 

August

 

edition

 

appearance

 

Syricius

 

candid

 
imputed