FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326  
327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   >>   >|  
as a dramatic poem, and as a drama superior. I would add, though without much confidence, another suggestion. The simplicity of _Macbeth_ is one of the reasons why many readers feel that, in spite of its being intensely 'romantic,' it is less unlike a classical tragedy than _Hamlet_ or _Othello_ or _King Lear_. And it is possible that this effect is, in a sense, the result of design. I do not mean that Shakespeare intended to imitate a classical tragedy; I mean only that he may have seen in the bloody story of Macbeth a subject suitable for treatment in a manner somewhat nearer to that of Seneca, or of the English Senecan plays familiar to him in his youth, than was the manner of his own mature tragedies. The Witches doubtless are 'romantic,' but so is the witch-craft in Seneca's _Medea_ and _Hercules Oetaeus_; indeed it is difficult to read the account of Medea's preparations (670-739) without being reminded of the incantations in _Macbeth_. Banquo's Ghost again is 'romantic,' but so are Seneca's ghosts. For the swelling of the style in some of the great passages--however immeasurably superior these may be to anything in Seneca--and certainly for the turgid bombast which occasionally appears in _Macbeth_, and which seems to have horrified Jonson, Shakespeare might easily have found a model in Seneca. Did he not think that this was the high Roman manner? Does not the Sergeant's speech, as Coleridge observed, recall the style of the 'passionate speech' of the Player in _Hamlet_,--a speech, be it observed, on a Roman subject?[241] And is it entirely an accident that parallels between Seneca and Shakespeare seem to be more frequent in _Macbeth_ than in any other of his undoubtedly genuine works except perhaps _Richard III._, a tragedy unquestionably influenced either by Seneca or by English Senecan plays?[242] If there is anything in these suggestions, and if we suppose that Shakespeare meant to give to his play a certain classical tinge, he might naturally carry out this idea in respect to the characters, as well as in other respects, by concentrating almost the whole interest on the important figures and leaving the others comparatively shadowy. 4 _Macbeth_ being more simple than the other tragedies, and broader and more massive in effect, three passages in it are of great importance as securing variety in tone, and also as affording relief from the feelings excited by the Witch-scenes and the principal character
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326  
327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Seneca

 

Macbeth

 
Shakespeare
 

romantic

 

tragedy

 

classical

 
manner
 
speech
 

Senecan

 

superior


effect
 
English
 
Hamlet
 

subject

 

tragedies

 

observed

 
passages
 

unquestionably

 

influenced

 

Sergeant


accident

 

Coleridge

 

Player

 

passionate

 

recall

 

parallels

 

Richard

 

genuine

 

frequent

 

undoubtedly


massive

 

importance

 

securing

 

broader

 

simple

 
comparatively
 
shadowy
 

variety

 

scenes

 

principal


character
 
excited
 

feelings

 

affording

 

relief

 

leaving

 
figures
 

naturally

 
suggestions
 

suppose