FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309  
310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   >>   >|  
cal wisdom of life. In order to enforce this moral, he passes to "another sort of _gnosis_ and instruction" (xviii. i), _viz._ the precepts of the "Two Ways," cited in a slightly different form from that found in the first part of the _Teaching of the Apostles_. The modifications, however, are all in a more spiritual direction, in keeping with the genuinely evangelic spirit which underlies and pervades even the allegorical ingenuities of the epistle. Its opening shows it to have been addressed to a Church, or rather a group of Churches, recently visited by the writer, who, while not wishing to write as an authoritative "teacher" so much as one who has come to love them as a friend (i. 8, cf. ix. 9), yet belongs to the class of "teachers" with a recognized spiritual gift (_charisma_), referred to _e.g._ in the _Didach[=e]_. He evidently feels in a position to give his _gnosis_ with some claim to a deferential hearing. This being so, the epistle was probably written, not to Alexandria, but rather by a "teacher" of the Alexandrine Church to some body of Christians in Lower Egypt among whom he had recently been visiting. This would explain the absence of specific address, so that it appears as in form a "general epistle," as Origen styles it. Its date has been much debated. But Lightfoot's reading of the apocalyptic passage in ch. iv.--with a slight modification suggested by Sir W. M. Ramsay--is really conclusive for the reign of Vespasian (A.D. 70-79). The main counter-view, in favour of a date about A.D. 130, can give no natural account of this passage, while it misconstrues the reference in ch. xvi. to the building of the spiritual temple, the Christian Church. Thus this epistle is the earliest of the Apostolic Fathers, and as such of special interest. Its central problem, the relation of Judaism and Christianity--of the Old and the New forms of a Covenant which, as Divine, must in a sense abide the same--was one which gave the early Church much trouble; nor, in absence of a due theory of the education of the race by gradual development, was it able to solve it satisfactorily. LITERATURE.--Besides collected editions of the Apostolic Fathers, see O. Braunsberger, _Der Apostel Barnabas, ... u. der ihm beigelegte Brief_ (Mainz, 1876); W. Cunningham, _Epistle of Barnabas_ (1877); sections in J. Donaldson, _The Apostolic Fathers_; E. Reuss, _Theologie chretienne_, vol. ii., and in M. von Engelhardt, _Das Christenthum Justins
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309  
310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Church

 

epistle

 
spiritual
 

Fathers

 
Apostolic
 

recently

 

Barnabas

 
passage
 

gnosis

 

teacher


absence

 

building

 

temple

 
Judaism
 

earliest

 

central

 
special
 

interest

 

problem

 

relation


Christian
 

conclusive

 
Vespasian
 
Ramsay
 

apocalyptic

 
slight
 

modification

 

suggested

 

natural

 

account


misconstrues

 

Christianity

 

counter

 
favour
 

reference

 

Apostel

 

beigelegte

 

Braunsberger

 

collected

 

editions


Donaldson

 

Theologie

 
sections
 

Cunningham

 

Epistle

 

Besides

 

LITERATURE

 

reading

 

chretienne

 
Covenant