FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978  
979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   >>   >|  
use of reason, in which sense we have already said that the image of God abides ever in the soul; "whether this image of God be so obsolete," as it were clouded, "as almost to amount to nothing," as in those who have not the use of reason; "or obscured and disfigured," as in sinners; or "clear and beautiful," as in the just; as Augustine says (De Trin. xiv, 6). Reply Obj. 4: By the vision of glory temporal things will be seen in God Himself; and such a vision of things temporal will belong to the image of God. This is what Augustine means (De Trin. xiv, 6), when he says that "in that nature to which the mind will blissfully adhere, whatever it sees it will see as unchangeable"; for in the Uncreated Word are the types of all creatures. _______________________ NINTH ARTICLE [I, Q. 93, Art. 9] Whether "Likeness" Is Properly Distinguished from "Image"? Objection 1: It would seem that "likeness" is not properly distinguished from "image." For genus is not properly distinguished from species. Now, "likeness" is to "image" as genus to species: because, "where there is image, forthwith there is likeness, but not conversely" as Augustine says (QQ. 83, qu. 74). Therefore "likeness" is not properly to be distinguished from "image." Obj. 2: Further, the nature of the image consists not only in the representation of the Divine Persons, but also in the representation of the Divine Essence, to which representation belong immortality and indivisibility. So it is not true to say that the "likeness is in the essence because it is immortal and indivisible; whereas the image is in other things" (Sent. ii, D, xvi). Obj. 3: Further, the image of God in man is threefold--the image of nature, of grace, and of glory, as above explained (A. 4). But innocence and righteousness belong to grace. Therefore it is incorrectly said (Sent. ii, D, xvi) "that the image is taken from the memory, the understanding and the will, while the likeness is from innocence and righteousness." Obj. 4: Further, knowledge of truth belongs to the intellect, and love of virtue to the will; which two things are parts of the image. Therefore it is incorrect to say (Sent. ii, D, xvi) that "the image consists in the knowledge of truth, and the likeness in the love of virtue." _On the contrary,_ Augustine says (QQ. 83, qu. 51): "Some consider that these two were mentioned not without reason, namely "image" and "likeness," since, if they meant the same, one
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978  
979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

likeness

 

Augustine

 
things
 

reason

 

Further

 

belong

 

nature

 
Therefore
 

representation

 

distinguished


properly

 

righteousness

 

temporal

 

species

 
Divine
 

vision

 

consists

 

innocence

 

virtue

 

knowledge


immortality

 

incorrect

 
Persons
 
Essence
 
mentioned
 

conversely

 
indivisibility
 

contrary

 
indivisible
 
incorrectly

explained
 

memory

 
understanding
 
threefold
 

immortal

 

essence

 
intellect
 
belongs
 

Whether

 
beautiful

disfigured

 

sinners

 

Himself

 

obscured

 

abides

 

amount

 
obsolete
 

clouded

 
blissfully
 

Properly