FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997  
998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   >>   >|  
ip of one. But many animals are hostile to one another, as the sheep and the wolf. Therefore all animals were not brought under the mastership of man. Obj. 3: Further, Jerome says [*The words quoted are not in St. Jerome's works. St. Thomas may have had in mind Bede, Hexaem., as quoted in the Glossa ordinaria on Gen. 1:26]: "God gave man mastership over the animals, although before sin he had no need of them: for God foresaw that after sin animals would become useful to man." Therefore, at least before sin, it was unfitting for man to make use of his mastership. Obj. 4: Further, it is proper to a master to command. But a command is not given rightly save to a rational being. Therefore man had no mastership over the irrational animals. _On the contrary,_ It is written (Gen. 1:26): "Let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea, and the birds of the air, and the beasts of the earth" [Vulg."and the whole earth"]. _I answer that,_ As above stated (Q. 95, A. 1) for his disobedience to God, man was punished by the disobedience of those creatures which should be subject to him. Therefore in the state of innocence, before man had disobeyed, nothing disobeyed him that was naturally subject to him. Now all animals are naturally subject to man. This can be proved in three ways. First, from the order observed by nature; for just as in the generation of things we perceive a certain order of procession of the perfect from the imperfect (thus matter is for the sake of form; and the imperfect form, for the sake of the perfect), so also is there order in the use of natural things; thus the imperfect are for the use of the perfect; as the plants make use of the earth for their nourishment, and animals make use of plants, and man makes use of both plants and animals. Therefore it is in keeping with the order of nature, that man should be master over animals. Hence the Philosopher says (Polit. i, 5) that the hunting of wild animals is just and natural, because man thereby exercises a natural right. Secondly, this is proved by the order of Divine Providence which always governs inferior things by the superior. Wherefore, as man, being made to the image of God, is above other animals, these are rightly subject to his government. Thirdly, this is proved from a property of man and of other animals. For we see in the latter a certain participated prudence of natural instinct, in regard to certain particular acts; whereas man possess
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997  
998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

animals

 

Therefore

 
natural
 

mastership

 

subject

 

proved

 

imperfect

 
perfect
 

things

 

plants


Jerome

 

disobedience

 

nature

 

rightly

 
master
 

command

 

quoted

 

disobeyed

 

naturally

 

Further


matter

 

generation

 
instinct
 
possess
 
prudence
 

observed

 
procession
 

perceive

 
participated
 
Secondly

Divine
 

Thirdly

 
exercises
 
government
 

Providence

 

superior

 
Wherefore
 
inferior
 

governs

 
Philosopher

keeping

 

nourishment

 

hunting

 

regard

 

property

 

beasts

 
ordinaria
 

Hexaem

 
Glossa
 

foresaw