FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735  
736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   >>   >|  
mentioned after the six, from its being devoted to cessation from work. _______________________ SECOND ARTICLE [I, Q. 74, Art. 2] Whether All These Days Are One Day? Objection 1: It would seem that all these days are one day. For it is written (Gen. 2:4, 5): "These are the generations of the heaven and the earth, when they were created, in the day that the Lord . . . made the heaven and the earth, and every plant of the field, before it sprung up in the earth." Therefore the day in which God made "the heaven and the earth, and every plant of the field," is one and the same day. But He made the heaven and the earth on the first day, or rather before there was any day, but the plant of the field He made on the third day. Therefore the first and third days are but one day, and for a like reason all the rest. Obj. 2: Further, it is said (Ecclus. 18:1): "He that liveth for ever, created all things together." But this would not be the case if the days of these works were more than one. Therefore they are not many but one only. Obj. 3: Further, on the seventh day God ceased from all new works. If, then, the seventh day is distinct from the other days, it follows that He did not make that day; which is not admissible. Obj. 4: Further, the entire work ascribed to one day God perfected in an instant, for with each work are the words (God) "said . . . . and it was . . . done." If, then, He had kept back His next work to another day, it would follow that for the remainder of a day He would have ceased from working and left it vacant, which would be superfluous. The day, therefore, of the preceding work is one with the day of the work that follows. _On the contrary,_ It is written (Gen. 1), "The evening and the morning were the second day . . . the third day," and so on. But where there is a second and third there are more than one. There was not, therefore, only one day. _I answer that,_ On this question Augustine differs from other expositors. His opinion is that all the days that are called seven, are one day represented in a sevenfold aspect (Gen. ad lit. iv, 22; De Civ. Dei xi, 9; Ad Orosium xxvi); while others consider there were seven distinct days, not one only. Now, these two opinions, taken as explaining the literal text of Genesis, are certainly widely different. For Augustine understands by the word "day," the knowledge in the mind of the angels, and hence, according to him, the first day denotes thei
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735  
736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
heaven
 

Further

 

Therefore

 

Augustine

 

ceased

 

seventh

 
distinct
 

written

 

created

 

sevenfold


aspect
 

represented

 

called

 
mentioned
 
devoted
 
opinion
 

differs

 
preceding
 

morning

 

contrary


evening

 

question

 

answer

 

expositors

 

understands

 
widely
 

knowledge

 
denotes
 

angels

 

Genesis


superfluous

 

Orosium

 

explaining

 

literal

 
opinions
 

follow

 
Objection
 

things

 

liveth

 

Ecclus


sprung

 

generations

 

reason

 
Whether
 

cessation

 
working
 
remainder
 

SECOND

 
ARTICLE
 
admissible