FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432  
433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   >>   >|  
yrant". King's officer vs. frog; frog vs. snail; snail vs. firefly; firefly vs. mosquito. Version e (Pampango), "The Bacuit's Case." Bacuit vs. frog; frog vs. turtle; turtle vs. firefly. With the exception of the substitution of snail for turtle, and crab for bird, in the Tagalog and Visayan versions, four of these forms (a, c, d, e) are practically identical. Pampango e lacks the fourth link in the chain (firefly vs. mosquito). Pampango b adds one link (horse vs. cock), and substitutes cock for frog; the method of narration varies somewhat from the others, also. The punishment of the mosquito differs in a, c, and d. "The Trial among Animals" develops into a "just-so" story, and may be a connecting link between a Tinguian fable (Cole, No. 84) and two Borneo sayings (Evans, 447). In the Tinguian, a mosquito came to bite a man. The man said, "You are very little, and can do nothing to me." The mosquito answered, "If you had no ears, I would eat you." The Bajan (Borneo) saying is, "Mosquitoes do not make their buzzing unless they are near men's ears; and then they say, 'If these were not your ears, I would swallow you.'" The Dusun version (Borneo) is, "The mosquito says, 'If these were not your horns, I would swallow you.'" The "killing fly on face" droll episode, which terminates the Tagalog version (d), we have already met with twice, Nos. 9 and 57 (q.v.). The link "firefly vs. mosquito" is found in the Visayan story "The Ape and the Firefly" (JAFL 20 : 314). There can be no question but that this cycle is native to the Islands, and was not imported from the Occident. A Malayan story given by Skeat (Fables and Folk-Tales from an Eastern Forest, 9-12), "Who Killed the Otter's Babies?" is clearly related to our tales, at least in idea and method:-- The mouse-deer (plandok) is charged with killing the otter's babies by trampling them to death, but excuses himself by saying that he was frightened because the woodpecker sounded his war-gong. In the trial before King Solomon, the above facts come out, and the woodpecker is asked why he sounded the war-gong. WOODPECKER. Because the great lizard was wearing his sword. GREAT LIZARD. Because the tortoise had donned his coat of mail. TORTOISE. Because King Crab was trailing his three-edged pike. KING CRAB. Because Crayfish was shouldering his lance. CRAYFISH. Because Otter was coming down to devour my children. Thus the cause of the death of the otter's chil
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432  
433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

mosquito

 

Because

 

firefly

 
Pampango
 

Borneo

 
turtle
 

Tinguian

 
woodpecker
 

sounded

 
swallow

killing

 
version
 
Tagalog
 
method
 

Bacuit

 
Visayan
 

plandok

 

charged

 

trampling

 
exception

frightened

 

excuses

 
substitution
 

babies

 

related

 

Fables

 

Malayan

 

Islands

 

imported

 

Occident


Babies

 

Killed

 

Eastern

 
Forest
 

Version

 

Crayfish

 
TORTOISE
 

trailing

 
shouldering
 

children


devour

 
CRAYFISH
 

coming

 
Solomon
 

officer

 

WOODPECKER

 
LIZARD
 

tortoise

 

donned

 

wearing