FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499  
500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   >>   >|  
e River Lulongo, Mr. Casement found that the amount of rubber collected from the natives generally proved to be in proportion to the number of guns used by the collecting force[481]. In some few cases natives were shot, even by white officers, on account of their failure to bring in the due amount of rubber[482]. A comparatively venial form of punishment was the capture and detention of wives until their husbands made up the tale. Is it surprising that thousands of the natives of the north have fled into French Congoland, itself by no means free from the grip of monopolist companies, but not terrorised as are most of the tribes of the "Free State"? [Footnote 481: _Ibid_. pp. 34, 43, 44, 49, 76, etc.] [Footnote 482: _Ibid_. p. 70. The effort made by the Chevalier De Cuvelier to rebut Mr. Casement's charges consists mainly of an ineffective _tu quoque_. To compare the rubber-tax of the Congo State with the hut-tax of Sierra Leone begs the whole question. Mr. Casement proves (p. 27) that the natives do not object to reasonable taxation which comes regularly. They do object to demands for rubber which are excessive and often involve great privations. Above all, the punishments utterly cow them and cause them to flee to the forests. The efforts of Mr. Macdonnell in _King Leopold II_. (London, 1905) to refute Mr. Casement also seem to me weak and inconclusive. The reply of the Congo Free State is printed by Mr. H.W. Wack in the Appendix of his _Story of the Congo Free State_ (New York, 1905). It convicts Mr. Casement of inaccuracy on a few details. Despite all that has been written by various apologists, it may be affirmed that the Congo Free State has yet made no adequate defence. Possibly it will appear in the report which, it is hoped, will be published in full by the official commission of inquiry now sitting.] Livingstone, in his day, regarded ivory as the chief cause of the slave-trade in Central and Eastern Africa; but it is questionable whether even ivory (now a vanishing product) brought more woe to millions of negroes than the viscous fluid which enables the pleasure-seekers of Paris, London, and New York to rush luxuriously through space. The swift Juggernaut of the present age is accountable for as much misery as ever sugar or ivory was in the old slave days. But it seems that, so long as the motor-car industry prospers, the dumb woes of the millions of Africa will count for little in the Courts of Europe.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499  
500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Casement

 

rubber

 

natives

 

object

 

Africa

 

Footnote

 
millions
 
amount
 

London

 

published


Leopold

 
Possibly
 

defence

 

report

 
refute
 

details

 

Despite

 
inaccuracy
 

convicts

 

official


Appendix

 

printed

 

affirmed

 
adequate
 

apologists

 
written
 

inconclusive

 

Central

 

misery

 

Juggernaut


present

 

accountable

 

Courts

 

Europe

 

prospers

 

industry

 

Eastern

 

questionable

 

vanishing

 

sitting


inquiry
 

Livingstone

 

regarded

 

product

 

brought

 

seekers

 

pleasure

 

luxuriously

 

enables

 

negroes