FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777  
778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   >>   >|  
the subject, not of guilt, but of punishment. Reply Obj. 2: Original sin is caused by the semen as instrumental cause. Now there is no need for anything to be more in the instrumental cause than in the effect; but only in the principal cause: and, in this way, original sin was in Adam more fully, since in him it had the nature of actual sin. Reply Obj. 3: The soul of any individual man was in Adam, in respect of his seminal power, not indeed as in its effective principle, but as in a dispositive principle: because the bodily semen, which is transmitted from Adam, does not of its own power produce the rational soul, but disposes the matter for it. Reply Obj. 4: The corruption of original sin is nowise caused by God, but by the sin alone of our first parent through carnal generation. And so, since creation implies a relation in the soul to God alone, it cannot be said that the soul is tainted through being created. On the other hand, infusion implies relation both to God infusing and to the flesh into which the soul is infused. And so, with regard to God infusing, it cannot be said that the soul is stained through being infused; but only with regard to the body into which it is infused. Reply Obj. 5: The common good takes precedence of private good. Wherefore God, according to His wisdom, does not overlook the general order of things (which is that such a soul be infused into such a body), lest this soul contract a singular corruption: all the more that the nature of the soul demands that it should not exist prior to its infusion into the body, as stated in the First Part (Q. 90, A. 4; Q. 118, A. 3). And it is better for the soul to be thus, according to its nature, than not to be at all, especially since it can avoid damnation, by means of grace. ________________________ SECOND ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 83, Art. 2] Whether Original Sin Is in the Essence of the Soul Rather Than in the Powers? Objection 1: It would seem that original sin is not in the essence of the soul rather than in the powers. For the soul is naturally apt to be the subject of sin, in respect of those parts which can be moved by the will. Now the soul is moved by the will, not as to its essence but only as to the powers. Therefore original sin is in the soul, not according to its essence, but only according to the powers. Obj. 2: Further, original sin is opposed to original justice. Now original justice was in a power of the soul, because po
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777  
778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

original

 

infused

 
nature
 

essence

 

powers

 

implies

 

corruption

 
relation
 

justice

 

infusion


infusing

 

regard

 

instrumental

 

principle

 
Original
 

caused

 

respect

 

subject

 

damnation

 

SECOND


ARTICLE

 

stated

 
demands
 
naturally
 
punishment
 

opposed

 
Further
 

Therefore

 
Essence
 
Whether

Rather
 

Objection

 
Powers
 
creation
 

generation

 

carnal

 
seminal
 
individual
 

actual

 
created

tainted

 

parent

 

produce

 

rational

 

transmitted

 

disposes

 
matter
 

effective

 
nowise
 

dispositive