FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806  
807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   >>   >|  
unishment accidentally. It is in this sense that the Apostle speaks (Rom. 1:24) when he says: "Wherefore God gave them up to the desires of their heart," i.e. to their passions; because, to wit, when men are deprived of the help of Divine grace, they are overcome by their passions. In this way sin is always said to be the punishment of a preceding sin. Secondly, by reason of the substance of the act, which is such as to cause pain, whether it be an interior act, as is clearly the case with anger or envy, or an exterior act, as is the case with one who endures considerable trouble and loss in order to achieve a sinful act, according to Wis. 5:7: "We wearied ourselves in the way of iniquity." Thirdly, on the part of the effect, so that one sin is said to be a punishment by reason of its effect. In the last two ways, a sin is a punishment not only in respect of a preceding sin, but also with regard to itself. Reply Obj. 1: Even when God punishes men by permitting them to fall into sin, this is directed to the good of virtue. Sometimes indeed it is for the good of those who are punished, when, to wit, men arise from sin, more humble and more cautious. But it is always for the amendment of others, who seeing some men fall from sin to sin, are the more fearful of sinning. With regard to the other two ways, it is evident that the punishment is intended for the sinner's amendment, since the very fact that man endures toil and loss in sinning, is of a nature to withdraw man from sin. Reply Obj. 2: This objection considers sin essentially as such: and the same answer applies to the Third Objection. ________________________ THIRD ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 87, Art. 3] Whether Any Sin Incurs a Debt of Eternal Punishment? Objection 1: It would seem that no sin incurs a debt of eternal punishment. For a just punishment is equal to the fault, since justice is equality: wherefore it is written (Isa. 27:8): "In measure against measure, when it shall be cast off, thou shalt judge it." Now sin is temporal. Therefore it does not incur a debt of eternal punishment. Obj. 2: Further, "punishments are a kind of medicine" (Ethic. ii, 3). But no medicine should be infinite, because it is directed to an end, and "what is directed to an end, is not infinite," as the Philosopher states (Polit. i, 6). Therefore no punishment should be infinite. Obj. 3: Further, no one does a thing always unless he delights in it for its own sake. But "God hat
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806  
807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

punishment

 

infinite

 
directed
 

regard

 

Objection

 

eternal

 

effect

 
endures
 

measure

 

passions


Therefore

 

sinning

 

medicine

 

preceding

 
reason
 

Further

 

amendment

 

objection

 

considers

 

Incurs


withdraw

 

essentially

 
ARTICLE
 
Eternal
 
applies
 

nature

 
Whether
 

answer

 
punishments
 
temporal

Philosopher
 

states

 
delights
 
justice
 

incurs

 

equality

 
wherefore
 
written
 

Punishment

 
permitting

interior

 

Secondly

 

substance

 

sinful

 

achieve

 

exterior

 
considerable
 

trouble

 
overcome
 

speaks