FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805  
806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   >>   >|  
shment itself is the effect of sin, not directly but dispositively. Sin, however, makes man deserving of punishment, and that is an evil: for Dionysius says (Div. Nom. iv) that "punishment is not an evil, but to deserve punishment is." Consequently the debt of punishment is considered to be directly the effect of sin. Reply Obj. 3: This punishment of the _inordinate affection_ is due to sin as overturning the order of reason. Nevertheless sin incurs a further punishment, through disturbing the order of the Divine or human law. ________________________ SECOND ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 87, Art. 2] Whether Sin Can Be the Punishment of Sin? Objection 1: It would seem that sin cannot be the punishment of sin. For the purpose of punishment is to bring man back to the good of virtue, as the Philosopher declares (Ethic. x, 9). Now sin does not bring man back to the good of virtue, but leads him in the opposite direction. Therefore sin is not the punishment of sin. Obj. 2: Further, just punishments are from God, as Augustine says (Qq. lxxxiii, qu. 82). But sin is not from God, and is an injustice. Therefore sin cannot be the punishment of sin. Obj. 3: Further, the nature of punishment is to be something against the will. But sin is something from the will, as shown above (Q. 74, AA. 1, 2). Therefore sin cannot be the punishment of sin. _On the contrary,_ Gregory speaks (Hom. xi in Ezech.) that some sins are punishments of others. _I answer that,_ We may speak of sin in two ways: first, in its essence, as such; secondly, as to that which is accidental thereto. Sin as such can nowise be the punishment of another. Because sin considered in its essence is something proceeding from the will, for it is from this that it derives the character of guilt. Whereas punishment is essentially something against the will, as stated in the First Part (Q. 48, A. 5). Consequently it is evident that sin regarded in its essence can nowise be the punishment of sin. On the other hand, sin can be the punishment of sin accidentally in three ways. First, when one sin is the cause of another, by removing an impediment thereto. For passions, temptations of the devil, and the like are causes of sin, but are impeded by the help of Divine grace which is withdrawn on account of sin. Wherefore since the withdrawal of grace is a punishment, and is from God, as stated above (Q. 79, A. 3), the result is that the sin which ensues from this is also a p
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805  
806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

punishment

 

Therefore

 
essence
 

virtue

 

stated

 

thereto

 

nowise

 
punishments
 

Further

 

considered


effect

 

directly

 

Consequently

 

Divine

 
Whereas
 

character

 

derives

 

essentially

 

dispositively

 

proceeding


Dionysius

 

accidental

 
Because
 
deserving
 
deserve
 

evident

 
withdrawn
 

account

 
shment
 
impeded

Wherefore
 

ensues

 
result
 
withdrawal
 

accidentally

 

regarded

 
passions
 
temptations
 

impediment

 
removing

Philosopher

 

declares

 

incurs

 

disturbing

 

Nevertheless

 

purpose

 
Whether
 

SECOND

 
Punishment
 

Objection