FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771  
772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   >>   >|  
inclination of habit is like that of nature which tends to one thing. Now original sin, even in one man, inclines to various and contrary sins. Therefore original sin is not one habit; but several. Obj. 3: Further, original sin infects every part of the soul. Now the different parts of the soul are different subjects of sin, as shown above (Q. 74). Since then one sin cannot be in different subjects, it seems that original sin is not one but several. _On the contrary,_ It is written (John 1:29): "Behold the Lamb of God, behold Him Who taketh away the sin of the world": and the reason for the employment of the singular is that the "sin of the world" is original sin, as a gloss expounds this passage. _I answer that,_ In one man there is one original sin. Two reasons may be assigned for this. The first is on the part of the cause of original sin. For it has been stated (Q. 81, A. 2), that the first sin alone of our first parent was transmitted to his posterity. Wherefore in one man original sin is one in number; and in all men, it is one in proportion, i.e. in relation to its first principle. The second reason may be taken from the very essence of original sin. Because in every inordinate disposition, unity of species depends on the cause, while the unity of number is derived from the subject. For example, take bodily sickness: various species of sickness proceed from different causes, e.g. from excessive heat or cold, or from a lesion in the lung or liver; while one specific sickness in one man will be one in number. Now the cause of this corrupt disposition that is called original sin, is one only, viz. the privation of original justice, removing the subjection of man's mind to God. Consequently original sin is specifically one, and, in one man, can be only one in number; while, in different men, it is one in species and in proportion, but is numerically many. Reply Obj. 1: The employment of the plural--"in sins"--may be explained by the custom of the Divine Scriptures in the frequent use of the plural for the singular, e.g. "They are dead that sought the life of the child"; or by the fact that all actual sins virtually pre-exist in original sin, as in a principle so that it is virtually many; or by the fact of there being many deformities in the sin of our first parent, viz. pride, disobedience, gluttony, and so forth; or by several parts of the soul being infected by original sin. Reply Obj. 2: Of itself and
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771  
772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

original

 

number

 
sickness
 

species

 

plural

 

reason

 

singular

 
parent
 

employment

 

contrary


virtually

 

subjects

 

principle

 

proportion

 
disposition
 

subject

 

bodily

 

corrupt

 

excessive

 

called


lesion

 

proceed

 
specific
 
explained
 
actual
 

sought

 
deformities
 

infected

 
disobedience
 
gluttony

Consequently
 

subjection

 
justice
 
removing
 

specifically

 

Scriptures

 
frequent
 
Divine
 

custom

 
numerically

derived

 

privation

 

written

 

behold

 

Behold

 

nature

 
inclination
 

inclines

 
infects
 

Further