FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245  
246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   >>   >|  
emporary speech, but preserves in the main the characteristics of the language of the Old Kingdom. _Middle and Late Egyptian._--These represent the vulgar speech of the Middle and New Kingdoms respectively. The former is found chiefly in tales, letters, &c., written in hieratic on papyri of the XIIIth Dynasty to the end of the Middle Kingdom; also in some inscriptions of the XVIIIth Dynasty. Late Egyptian is seen in hieratic papyri of the XVIIIth to the XXIst Dynasties. The spelling of Late Egyptian is very extraordinary, full of false etymologies, otiose signs, &c., the old orthography being quite unable to adapt itself neatly to the profoundly modified language; nevertheless, this clumsy spelling is expressive, and the very mistakes are instructive as to the pronunciation. _Demotic._--Demotic Egyptian seems to represent approximately the vulgar speech of the Saite period, and is written in the "demotic" character, which may be traced back to the XXVIth Dynasty, if not to a still earlier time. With progressive changes, this form of the language is found in documents reaching down to the fall of Paganism in the 4th century A.D.[12] Under the later Ptolemies and the Roman rule documents in Greek are more abundant than in demotic, and the language of the ruling classes must have begun to penetrate the masses deeply. _Coptic._--This, in the main, represents the popular language of early Christian Egypt from the 3rd to perhaps the 10th century A.D., when the growth of Coptic as a literary language must have ceased. The Greek alphabet, reinforced by a few signs borrowed from demotic, rendered the spoken tongue so accurately that four distinct, though closely allied, dialects are readily distinguishable in Coptic MSS.; ample remains are found of renderings of the Scriptures into all these dialects. The distinctions between the dialects consist largely in pronunciation, but extend also to the vocabulary, word-formation and syntax. Such interchanges are found as _l_ for _r_, [Coptic: qima] (_k_, _ch_) for [Coptic: dandia] (_dj_), final _i_ for final _e_, _a_ for _e_, _a_ for _o_. Early in the 2nd century A.D., pagan Egyptians, or perhaps foreigners settled in Egypt, essayed, as yet unskilfully, to write the native language in Greek letters. This _Old Coptic_, as it is termed, was still almost entirely free from Greek loan-words, and its strong archaisms are doubtless accounted for by the literary language, even in its mos
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245  
246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
language
 

Coptic

 

Egyptian

 

dialects

 

demotic

 

Dynasty

 

century

 

speech

 

Middle

 
literary

pronunciation

 

documents

 

spelling

 

Demotic

 

hieratic

 

papyri

 

Kingdom

 
written
 
letters
 
vulgar

represent

 

XVIIIth

 

strong

 

distinct

 

archaisms

 

allied

 

closely

 

readily

 
remains
 

renderings


Scriptures
 
distinguishable
 

doubtless

 
borrowed
 
rendered
 
ceased
 

reinforced

 

accounted

 
spoken
 
tongue

growth
 

accurately

 

alphabet

 
dandia
 
Egyptians
 

termed

 

unskilfully

 

essayed

 

foreigners

 

settled