FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258  
259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   >>   >|  
ferent phonograms can be found. The number of those commonly employed in good writing is between seventy and eighty. The most important phonograms are the _uniliteral_ or _alphabetic_ signs, twenty-four in number in the Old Kingdom and without any homophones: later these were increased by homophones to thirty. Of _biliteral_ phonograms--each expressing a combination of two consonants--there were about fifty commonly used: some fifteen or twenty were rarely used. As Egyptian roots seldom exceeded three letters, there was no need for _triliteral_ phonograms to spell them. There is, however, one triliteral phonogram, the eagle, [HRG], _tyw_, or _tiu_ (?), used for the plural ending of adjectives in _y_ formed from words ending in _t_ (whether radical or the feminine ending). The phonetic values of the signs are derived from their word-sign values and consist usually of the bare root, though there are rare examples of the retention of a flexional ending; they often ignore also the weaker consonants of the root, and on the same principle reduce a repeated consonant to a single one, as when the hoe [HRG], _hnn_, has the phonetic value _hn_. The history of some of the alphabetic signs is still very obscure, but a sufficient number of them have been explained to make it nearly certain that the values of all were obtained on the same principles.[15] Some of the ancient words from which the phonetic values were derived probably fell very early into disuse, and may never be discoverable in the texts that have come down to us. The following are among those most easily explained:-- [HRG: i], reed flower, value _y_ and [Hebrew: alef]; from [HRGs: i-A-Hn], _y'_, "reed." (It seems as if the two values _y_ and [Hebrew: alef] were obtained by choosing first one and then the other of the two semi-consonants composing the name. They are much confused, and a conventional symbol _l_ has to be adopted for rendering [HRG: i].) [HRG: a], forearm, value '([Hebrew: ayin]); from [HRGs: a:Z1], '([Hebrew: ayin]), "hand." [HRG: r], mouth, value _r_; from [HRGs: r:Z1], _r_, "mouth." [HRG: X], belly and teats, value _h_; from [HRGs: X:t*Z1], _h.t_, "belly." (The feminine ending is here, as usual, neglected.) [HRG: S], tank, value _s_; from [HRGs: S:Z1], _s_, "tank." [HRG: q], slope of earth value _q_
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258  
259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

ending

 

values

 
Hebrew
 

phonograms

 
consonants
 

phonetic

 

number

 
obtained
 

triliteral

 

alphabetic


derived

 

commonly

 

twenty

 
homophones
 

feminine

 

explained

 
discoverable
 

disuse

 

sufficient

 

obscure


principles
 

ancient

 
symbol
 
adopted
 

conventional

 
confused
 

rendering

 

forearm

 

neglected

 

composing


easily

 

flower

 

choosing

 
fifteen
 

combination

 

expressing

 

biliteral

 

rarely

 

letters

 

exceeded


Egyptian

 

seldom

 
thirty
 

increased

 

writing

 

seventy

 

employed

 

ferent

 

eighty

 
important