FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   >>   >|  
tepayers have no control, this being a violation of the principle of civil and religious liberty, _and which_ the memorialists believe would provoke a determined and conscientious resistance." Here _which_ ought grammatically to refer to "portion" or "schools." But it seems intended to refer to "violation." Omit "and," or repeat "a violation" before "which," or turn the sentence otherwise. *10. Equivalents for Relative.* *(_a_) Participle.*--"Men _thirsting_ (for 'men _that thirst_') for revenge are not indifferent to plunder." The objection to the participle is that here, as often, it creates a little ambiguity. The above sentence may mean, "men, _when_ they thirst," or "_though_ they thirst," as well as "men _that_ thirst." Often however there is no ambiguity: "I have documents _proving_ this conclusively." *(_b_) Infinitive.*--Instead of "He was the first _that_ entered" you can write "_to_ enter;" for "He is not a man _who_ will act dishonestly," "_to_ act." This equivalent cannot often be used. *(_c_) Whereby, wherein, &c.,* can sometimes be used for "by _which_," "in _which_," so as to avoid a harsh repetition of "_which_." "The means _whereby_ this may be effected." But this use is somewhat antiquated. *(_d_) If.*--"The man _that_ does not care for music is to be pitied" can be written (though not so forcibly), "_If_ a man does not care for music, he is to be pitied." It is in long sentences that this equivalent will be found most useful. *(_e_) And this.*--"He did his best, _which_ was all that could be expected," can be written, "_and this_ was all that, &c." *(_f_) What.*--"Let me repeat _that which_[9] you ought to know, that _that which_ is worth doing is worth doing well." "Let me repeat, _what_ you ought to know, that _what_ is worth doing is worth doing well." *(_g_) Omission of Relative.*--It is sometimes thought ungrammatical to omit the relative, as in "The man (that) you speak of." On the contrary, _that_ when an object (not when a subject) may be omitted, wherever the antecedent and the subject of the relative sentence are brought into juxtaposition by the omission. *10 a'. Repeat the Antecedent in some new form, where there is any ambiguity.* This is particularly useful after a negative: "He said that he would not even hear me, _which_ I confess I had expected." Here the meaning may be, "I had expected that he would," or "that he would not, hear me." Write, "_a refusal_, or,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
thirst
 

repeat

 

sentence

 

expected

 

violation

 

ambiguity

 
equivalent
 

relative

 

subject

 
pitied

written

 

Relative

 

tepayers

 

intended

 
Omission
 

ungrammatical

 

thought

 
contrary
 

negative

 

refusal


meaning

 

confess

 
portion
 

omitted

 

schools

 

object

 
antecedent
 

brought

 
Repeat
 
Antecedent

omission

 

juxtaposition

 

Equivalents

 

principle

 

entered

 

religious

 

objection

 

dishonestly

 

participle

 
Instead

Infinitive
 

creates

 

conclusively

 

proving

 
documents
 

liberty

 

provoke

 
plunder
 

resistance

 

antiquated