FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1495   1496   1497   1498   1499   1500   1501   1502   1503   1504   1505   1506   1507   1508   1509   1510   1511   1512   1513   1514   1515   1516   1517   1518   1519  
1520   1521   1522   1523   1524   1525   1526   1527   1528   1529   1530   1531   1532   1533   1534   1535   1536   1537   1538   1539   1540   1541   1542   1543   1544   >>   >|  
ever it might immediately or afterwards decree regarding its -dediticii-, could never perpetrate as respected them a violation of rights. This destitution of rights only ceased on the conclusion of a treaty of alliance (Liv. xxxiv. 57). Accordingly -deditio- and -foedus- appear in constitutional law as contrasted terms excluding each other (Liv. iv. 30, xxviii. 34; Cod. Theod. vii. 13, 16 and Gothofr. thereon), and of precisely the same nature is the distinction current among the jurists between the -quasi- dediticii- and the -quasi Latini-, for the Latins are just the -foederati- in an eminent sense (Cic. pro Balb. 24, 54). According to the older constitutional law there were, with the exception of the not numerous communities that were declared to have forfeited their treaties in consequence of the Hannibalic war (p. 24), no Italian -dediticii-; in the Plautian law of 664-5 the description: -qui foederatis civitatibus adscripti fuerunt- (Cic. pro Arch. 4, 7) still included in substance all Italians. But as the -dediticii- who received the franchise supplementary in 667 cannot reasonably be understood as embracing merely the Bruttii and Picentes, we may assume that all the insurgents, so far as they had laid down their arms and had not acquired the franchise under the Plautio-Papirian law were treated as -dediticii-, or--which is the same thing-- that their treaties cancelled as a matter of course by the insurrection (hence -qui foederati fuerunt- in the passage of Cicero cited) were not legally renewed to them on their surrender. 21. II. III. Laws Imposing Taxes 22. IV. VI. The Equestrian Party 23. II. XI. Squandering of the Spoil 24. It is not clear, what the -lex unciaria- of the consuls Sulla and Rufus in the year 666 prescribed in this respect; but the simplest hypothesis is that which regards it as a renewal of the law of 397 (i. 364), so that the highest allowable rate of interest was again 1 1/12th of the capital for the year of ten months or 10 per cent for the year of twelve months. 25. III. XI. Reform of the Centuries 26. II. III. Powers of the Senate 27. IV. II. Death of Gracchus, IV. III. Attack on The Transmarine Colonization. Downfall of Gracchus, IV. VI. Saturninus Assailed 28. II. III. The Tribunate of the People As an Instrument of Government Chapter VIII 1. IV. VIII. Occupation of Cilicia 2. III. IX. Armenia 3. IV. I. Western Asia 4. The words quo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1495   1496   1497   1498   1499   1500   1501   1502   1503   1504   1505   1506   1507   1508   1509   1510   1511   1512   1513   1514   1515   1516   1517   1518   1519  
1520   1521   1522   1523   1524   1525   1526   1527   1528   1529   1530   1531   1532   1533   1534   1535   1536   1537   1538   1539   1540   1541   1542   1543   1544   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

dediticii

 

Gracchus

 
fuerunt
 

foederati

 

treaties

 

constitutional

 

months

 

franchise

 

rights

 

cancelled


matter

 
Papirian
 
acquired
 

Plautio

 
consuls
 
treated
 

unciaria

 

Squandering

 

legally

 

Imposing


surrender

 

renewed

 

Cicero

 

passage

 

insurrection

 

Equestrian

 

Assailed

 

Saturninus

 

Tribunate

 
People

Downfall

 

Colonization

 
Senate
 

Attack

 

Transmarine

 
Instrument
 

Government

 
Western
 

Armenia

 
Occupation

Chapter

 

Cilicia

 

Powers

 
highest
 

allowable

 

renewal

 
respect
 

simplest

 

hypothesis

 
interest