FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1504   1505   1506   1507   1508   1509   1510   1511   1512   1513   1514   1515   1516   1517   1518   1519   1520   1521   1522   1523   1524   1525   1526   1527   1528  
1529   1530   1531   1532   1533   1534   1535   1536   1537   1538   1539   1540   1541   1542   1543   1544   1545   1546   1547   1548   1549   1550   1551   1552   1553   >>   >|  
ng the senate up to 500 or 600 members; and this number results, if we assume that 20 new members, at an average age of 30, were admitted annually, and we estimate the average duration of the senatorial dignity at from 25 to 30 years. At a numerously attended sitting of the senate in Cicero's time 417 members were present. 18. II. III. The Senate. Its Composition 19. IV. VI. Political Projects of Marius 20. III. XI. Interference of the Community in War and Administration 21. IV. VII. Legislation of Sulla 22. II. III. Restrictions As to the Accumulation and the Reoccupation of Offices 23. IV. II. Attempts at Reform 24. To this the words of Lepidus in Sallust (Hist. i. 41, 11 Dietsch) refer: -populus Romanus excitus... iure agitandi-, to which Tacitus (Ann. iii. 27) alludes: -statim turbidis Lepidi rogationibus neque multo post tribunis reddita licentia quoquo vellent populum agitandi-. That the tribunes did not altogether lose the right of discussing matters with the people is shown by Cic. De Leg. iii. 4, 10 and more clearly by the -plebiscitum de Thermensibus-, which however in the opening formula also designates itself as issued -de senatus sententia-. That the consuls on the other hand could under the Sullan arrangements submit proposals to the people without a previous resolution of the senate, is shown not only by the silence of the authorities, but also by the course of the revolutions of 667 and 676, whose leaders for this very reason were not tribunes but consuls. Accordingly we find at this period consular laws upon secondary questions of administration, such as the corn law of 681, for which at other times we should have certainly found -plebiscita-. 25. II. III. Influence of the Elections 26. IV. II. Vote by Ballot 27. For this hypothesis there is no other proof, except that the Italian Celt-land was as decidedly not a province--in the sense in which the word signifies a definite district administered by a governor annually changed--in the earlier times, as it certainly was one in the time of Caesar (comp. Licin. p. 39; -data erat et Sullae provincia Gallia Cisalpina-). The case is much the same with the advancement of the frontier; we know that formerly the Aesis, and in Caesar's time the Rubico, separated the Celtic land from Italy, but we do not know when the boundary was shifted. From the circumstance indeed, that Marcus Terentius Varro Lucullus as propraetor unde
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1504   1505   1506   1507   1508   1509   1510   1511   1512   1513   1514   1515   1516   1517   1518   1519   1520   1521   1522   1523   1524   1525   1526   1527   1528  
1529   1530   1531   1532   1533   1534   1535   1536   1537   1538   1539   1540   1541   1542   1543   1544   1545   1546   1547   1548   1549   1550   1551   1552   1553   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

members

 

senate

 
agitandi
 

Caesar

 

people

 

tribunes

 

average

 

annually

 

consuls

 

secondary


questions

 
administration
 
submit
 

Sullan

 
plebiscita
 
arrangements
 

silence

 

leaders

 

authorities

 

revolutions


Influence

 

resolution

 

period

 

consular

 

proposals

 

reason

 

previous

 

Accordingly

 

frontier

 
advancement

separated

 

Rubico

 
provincia
 

Sullae

 

Gallia

 
Cisalpina
 

Celtic

 
Terentius
 

Marcus

 
Lucullus

propraetor

 

circumstance

 

boundary

 
shifted
 

Italian

 

province

 
decidedly
 

Ballot

 

hypothesis

 
signifies