FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1498   1499   1500   1501   1502   1503   1504   1505   1506   1507   1508   1509   1510   1511   1512   1513   1514   1515   1516   1517   1518   1519   1520   1521   1522  
1523   1524   1525   1526   1527   1528   1529   1530   1531   1532   1533   1534   1535   1536   1537   1538   1539   1540   1541   1542   1543   1544   1545   1546   1547   >>   >|  
ook place, if not on the same day as the storming of Athens (Pausan, i. 20), at any rate soon afterwards, perhaps in March 668, is tolerably certain. That the succeeding Thessalian and the second Boeotian campaign took up not merely the remainder of 668 but also the whole of 669, is in itself probable and is rendered still more so by the fact that Sulla's enterprises in Asia are not sufficient to fill more than a single campaign. Licinianus also appears to indicate that Sulla returned to Athens for the winter of 668-669 and there took in hand the work of investigation and punishment; after which he relates the battle of Orchomenus. The crossing of Sulla to Asia has accordingly been placed not in 669, but in 670. 16. The resolution of the citizens of Ephesus to this effect has recently been found (Waddington, Additions to Lebas, Inscr. iii. 136 a). They had, according to their own declaration, fallen into the power of Mithradates "the king of Cappadocia," being frightened by the magnitude of his forces and the suddenness of his attack; but, when opportunity offered, they declared war against him "for the rule (--egemonia--) of the Romans and the common weal." 17. The statement that Mithradates in the peace stipulated for impunity to the towns which had embraced his side (Memnon, 35) seems, looking to the character of the victor and of the vanquished, far from credible, and it is not given by Appian or by Licinianus. They neglected to draw up the treaty of peace in writing, and this neglect afterwards left room far various misrepresentations. 18. Armenian tradition also is acquainted with the first Mithradatic war. Ardasches king of Armenia--Moses of Chorene tells us--was not content with the second rank which rightfully belonged to him in the Persian (Parthian) empire, but compelled the Parthian king Arschagan to cede to him the supreme power, whereupon he had a palace built for himself in Persia and had coins struck there with his own image. He appointed Arschagan viceroy of Persia and his son Dicran (Tigranes) viceroy of Armenia, and gave his daughter Ardaschama in marriage to the great-prince of the Iberians Mihrdates (Mithradates) who was descended from Mihrdates satrap of Darius and governor appointed by Alexander over the conquered Iberians, and ruled in the northern mountains as well as over the Black Sea. Ardasches then took Croesus the king of the Lydians prisoner, subdued the mainland between
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1498   1499   1500   1501   1502   1503   1504   1505   1506   1507   1508   1509   1510   1511   1512   1513   1514   1515   1516   1517   1518   1519   1520   1521   1522  
1523   1524   1525   1526   1527   1528   1529   1530   1531   1532   1533   1534   1535   1536   1537   1538   1539   1540   1541   1542   1543   1544   1545   1546   1547   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Mithradates

 

Licinianus

 
Parthian
 

Persia

 

appointed

 

viceroy

 

Mihrdates

 

Armenia

 

Arschagan

 

campaign


Ardasches

 
Iberians
 
Athens
 

subdued

 
embraced
 
Mithradatic
 

misrepresentations

 

acquainted

 

tradition

 

Armenian


neglect

 

Appian

 

neglected

 

credible

 

victor

 

vanquished

 

Memnon

 

mainland

 

character

 
treaty

writing

 

compelled

 
Croesus
 

prince

 

marriage

 
Ardaschama
 

Lydians

 
Tigranes
 

daughter

 
descended

satrap

 

northern

 

mountains

 
conquered
 

Darius

 

governor

 
Alexander
 

Dicran

 

Persian

 
empire