FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524  
525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   >>  
he object being known first. To this Vedanta replies that the maxim that the qualification must be known before the qualified thing is known is groundless, for we can as well perceive the thing first and then its qualification. It is not out of place here to say that negation is not a separate entity, but is only a peculiar mode of the manifestation of the positive. Even the naiyayikas would agree that in the expression "there is no negation of a jug here," no separate negation can be accepted, for the jug is already present before us. As there are distinctions and differences in positive entities by illusory impositions, so negations are also distinguished by similar illusory impositions and appear as the negation of jug, negation of cloth, etc.; so all distinctions between negations are unnecessary, and it may be accepted that negation like position is one which appears as many on account of illusory distinctions and impositions. Thus the 456 content of negation being itself positive, there is no reason to object that such perceptions as "I do not know" refer to the perception of an indefinite ajnana in consciousness. So also the perception "I do not know what you say" is not the perception of negation, for this would require that the hearer should know first what was said by the speaker, and if this is so then it is impossible to say "I do not know what you say." So also the cognition "I was sleeping long and did not know anything" has to be admitted as referring to the perception of the indefinite during sleep. It is not true as some say that during sleep there is no perception, but what appears to the awakened man as "I did not know anything so long" is only an inference; for, it is not possible to infer from the pleasant and active state of the senses in the awakened state that the activity had ceased in the sleep state and that since he had no object of knowledge then, he could not know anything; for there is no invariable concomitance between the pleasant and active state of the senses and the absence of objects of knowledge in the immediately preceding state. During sleep there is a mental state of the form of the indefinite, and during the awakened state it is by the impression (_sa@mskara_) of the aforesaid mental state of ajnana that one remembers that state and says that "I did not perceive anything so long." The indefinite (_ajnana_) perceived in consciousness is more fundamental and general than t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524  
525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   >>  



Top keywords:

negation

 

perception

 

indefinite

 

positive

 

distinctions

 

impositions

 
awakened
 
illusory
 

ajnana

 

object


pleasant

 
separate
 

senses

 

negations

 
qualification
 

consciousness

 

perceive

 
appears
 

active

 

mental


accepted

 

knowledge

 

admitted

 
general
 

objects

 
fundamental
 

During

 

impossible

 

impression

 

cognition


sleeping

 

preceding

 

referring

 

immediately

 

invariable

 

concomitance

 

speaker

 

activity

 

remembers

 

aforesaid


perceived
 

absence

 

ceased

 

mskara

 

inference

 

naiyayikas

 

manifestation

 

peculiar

 

expression

 

differences