FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539  
540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   >>  
he word maya occurs only once in the B@rhadara@nyaka and once only in the Pras'na. In early Pali Buddhist writings it occurs only in the sense of deception or deceitful conduct. Buddhagho@sa uses it in the sense of magical power. In Nagarjuna and the _Lankavatara_ it has acquired the sense of illusion. In S'a@nkara the word maya is used in the sense of illusion, both as a principle of creation as a s'akti (power) or accessory cause, and as the phenomenal creation itself, as the illusion of world-appearance. It may also be mentioned here that Gau@dapada the teacher of S'a@nkara's teacher Govinda worked out a system with the help of the maya doctrine. The Upani@sads are permeated with the spirit of an earnest enquiry after absolute truth. They do not pay any attention towards explaining the world-appearance or enquiring into its relations with absolute truth. Gau@dapada asserts clearly and probably for the first time among Hindu thinkers, that the world does not exist in reality, that it is maya, and not reality. When the highest truth is realized maya is not removed, for it is not a thing, but the whole world-illusion is dissolved into its own airy nothing never to recur again. It was Gau@dapada who compared the world-appearance with dream appearances, and held that objects seen in the waking world are unreal, because they are capable of being seen like objects seen in a dream, which are false and unreal. The atman says Gau@dapada is at once the cognizer and the cognized, the world subsists in the atman through maya. As atman alone is real and all duality an illusion, it necessarily follows that all experience is also illusory. S'a@nkara expounded this doctrine in his elaborate commentaries on the Upani@sads and the Brahma-sutra, but he seems to me to have done little more than making explicit the doctrine of maya. Some of his followers however examined and thought over the concept of maya and brought out in bold relief its character as the indefinable thereby substantially contributing to the development of the Vedanta philosophy. Vedanta theory of Perception and Inference [Footnote ref 1]. Prama@na is the means that leads to right knowledge. If memory is intended to be excluded from the definition then ____________________________________________________________________ [Footnote 1: Dharmarajadhvarindra and his son Ramak@r@s@na worked out a complete scheme of the theory of Vedantic perception and inference
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539  
540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   >>  



Top keywords:

illusion

 

dapada

 

appearance

 

doctrine

 

Vedanta

 
theory
 

worked

 

teacher

 

reality

 
absolute

creation
 

occurs

 

unreal

 

objects

 

Footnote

 

making

 
Brahma
 

cognized

 

necessarily

 

duality


expounded

 

illusory

 
experience
 

commentaries

 

cognizer

 
subsists
 

elaborate

 
substantially
 
memory
 

intended


excluded
 

knowledge

 

definition

 
scheme
 
Vedantic
 

perception

 

inference

 

complete

 

Dharmarajadhvarindra

 

concept


brought

 

thought

 

examined

 

followers

 

relief

 

character

 

philosophy

 

Perception

 

Inference

 

development