FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372  
373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   >>   >|  
nt_, etc. _Irenaeus_, against heresies, 2. 46; 5. 20; _Letter to Florinus_ in Eusebius' Hist. Eccl., 5. 20: _Clement of Alexandria_, Strom., 7, p. 757; _Tertullian_, against heretics, chap. 30. 36: against Marcion, 4. 6, etc. The canon was not, however, completed in its present form; for the right of certain books--the so-called _antilegomena_, chap. 6. 6.--to a place in it remained for a considerable time an open question, which, in its application to particular books was answered differently in the East and the West. See chap. 6. On the other hand, certain writings of the apostolic fathers (as the so-called epistle of Barnabas, the Shepherd of Hermas, the epistle of Clement of Rome to the Corinthians), being read in certain of the early churches, found their way into some codices of the New Testament. Chap. 6, No. 4. To the latter part of the second century belong two important canons, that of the Syriac Peshito, and the Muratorian canon. The former of these represents the judgment of the _Eastern_ churches; the latter apparently that of the _Western_. The canon of the Peshito has, of the seven disputed books, _Hebrews_ and _James_. It wants the other five, namely, _2 Peter_, _2, 3 John_, _Jude_, _Revelation_. The Muratorian canon is in such an imperfect state that its testimony on some points is doubtful. It contains _Jude_ and _Revelation_; perhaps also _2, 3 John_. It wants _Hebrews_, and _2 Peter_, and it adds the apocryphal book called the _Apocalypse of Peter_. Origen in the third century (as quoted by Eusebius, Hist. Eccl., 6. 25) and Eusebius in the fourth, Hist. Eccl., 3. 25, give each a review of the New Testament canon with a statement of the differing judgments as to the disputed books. The details will come up hereafter in connection with the books in question. The Synodical Council of Loadicea, which was probably held between A.D. 343-381, gives in its 60th canon (the genuineness of which, however, has been called in question by some) a list of the books of the Old and New Testaments. That of the New Testament wants the _Apocalypse_. The third Council of Carthage, held A.D. 397, contains all the books of our present canon. So also the Latin fathers, as Jerome, Rufinus, etc. But the Syrian churches still adhered to the canon of the Peshito. 7. The history of Christian opinion in regard t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372  
373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

called

 

Testament

 
question
 

Peshito

 

churches

 

Eusebius

 
epistle
 
Council
 

fathers

 

century


disputed
 
Hebrews
 
Revelation
 

Muratorian

 

Apocalypse

 

present

 
Clement
 

Syrian

 

points

 

doubtful


Rufinus

 

apocryphal

 

Jerome

 

testimony

 

Christian

 

opinion

 

regard

 

history

 

imperfect

 

adhered


Origen

 

details

 

differing

 

judgments

 

Testaments

 
Synodical
 
connection
 

statement

 

quoted

 

Carthage


fourth
 
review
 

genuineness

 

Loadicea

 

considerable

 

remained

 
antilegomena
 

application

 
answered
 

differently