FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310  
311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   >>   >|  
third series of experimental magnetical discoveries extends throughout Book III. [86] PAGE 31, LINE 30. Page 31, line 25. _verticem._--The context and the heading of the Chapter appear to require _verticitatem_. All editions, however, read _verticem_. [87] PAGE 32, LINE 12. Page 32, line 9. _Gartias ab horto._--The passage from Gartias ab Horto runs as follows in the Italian edition of 1616, _Dell' Historia dei Semplici Aromati._... di Don Garzia dall' Horto, Medico Portughese, ... Venezia MDCXVI., p. 208. "Ne meno e questa pietra velenosa, si come molti hanno tenuto; imperoche le genti di queste bande dicono che la Calamita presa per bocca, pero in poca {28} quantita, conserva la gioventu. La onde si racconta, che il Re di Zeilan il vecchio' s'haveva fatto fare tutti i vasi, dove si cocevano le vivade per lui, di Calamita. Et questo lo disse a me colui proprio, che fu a questo officio destinato." [88] PAGE 32, LINE 29. Page 32, line 29. _Plutarchus & C. Ptolemaeus._--The garlick myth has already been referred to in the note to p. 1. The originals are Plutarch, _Quaestiones Platonicae_, lib. vii., cap. 7, s. 1; C. Ptolemaeus, _Opus Quadripartitum,_ bk. i., cap. 3. The English translation of the latter, by Whalley (London, 1701), p. 10, runs: "For if the _Loadstone_ be _Rubbed_ with _Garlick_, the _Iron will not be drawn by it_." [89] PAGE 32, LINE 32. Page 32, line 33. _Medici nonnulli._--This is apparently a reference to the followers of Rhazes and Paracelsus. The argument of Gilbert as to the inefficacy of powdered loadstones is reproduced more fully by William Barlowe in his _Magneticall Aduertisements_ (1616, p. 7), as follows: "It is the goodnesse of the _Loadstone_ ioyned with a fit forme that will shew great force. For as a very good forme with base substance can doe but very litle, so the substance of the _Loadstone_ bee it neuer so excellent, except it haue some conuenient forme, is not auaileable. For example, an excellent _loadstone_ of a pound waight and of a good fashion, being vsed artificially, may take vp foure pounds of Iron; beate it into small pouder, and it shall bee of no force to take vp one ounce of Iron; yea I am very well assured that halfe an ounce of a Loadstone of good fashion, and of like vertue will take vp more then that pound will doe being beaten into powder. Whence (to adde this by the way) it appeareth manifestly, that it is a great error of those Physitions and Surgeons, w
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310  
311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Loadstone

 

fashion

 

Calamita

 

questo

 
substance
 

excellent

 

Gartias

 

verticem

 
Ptolemaeus
 

reference


Aduertisements
 
Whalley
 

Rubbed

 

William

 

Magneticall

 

Barlowe

 

followers

 

London

 

powdered

 

loadstones


inefficacy
 

Gilbert

 

argument

 

Paracelsus

 

nonnulli

 

reproduced

 
Medici
 
Rhazes
 

apparently

 
Garlick

assured

 

vertue

 
beaten
 

powder

 

Physitions

 
Surgeons
 
manifestly
 

appeareth

 

Whence

 

pouder


goodnesse

 

ioyned

 

conuenient

 
pounds
 

artificially

 
auaileable
 

loadstone

 

waight

 

Garzia

 
Medico