FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325  
326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   >>  
athered within the space of twelve stadia, and no where else: blacke it is, plaine and even, of a hollow substance in manner of the pumish stone, not much differing from the nature of wood; light, brittle, and if it bee rubbed or bruised, of a strong flavour." (Book xxxvi., chap. xviii.) In the Commentary of Joannes Ruellius upon Dioscorides, _Pedanii Dioscoridis Anazarbei de medicinali materia libri sex, Ioanne Ruellio Suessionensi interprete_ ... (Frankfurt, 1543, fol., liber quintus, cap. xcii.) is the following description: {38} "In Gagatarum lapidum genere, praeferendus qui celeriter accenditur, et odorem bituminis reddit. niger est plerunque, et squalidus, crustosus, per quam levis. Vis ei molliendi, et discutiendi. deprehendit sonticum morbum suffitus, recreatque uuluae strangulationes. fugat serpentes nidore. podagricis medicaminibus, et a copis additur. In Cilicia nasci solet, qua influens amnis in mare effunditur, proxime oppidum quod Plagiopolis dicitur. vocatur autem et locus et amnis Gagas, in cujus faucibus ii lapides inveniuntur. "Gagates lapis colore atro, Germanis Schwartzer augstein, voce parum depravata, dicitur. odore dum uritur bituminis, siccat, glutinat, digerit admotus, in corollis precariis et salinis frequens." And in the _Scholia_ upon Dioscorides of Joannes Lonicer (Marpurgi, 1643, cap. xcvii., p. 80) is the following: "_De Gagate Lapide._ Ab natali solo, urbe nimirum Gagae Lyciae nomen habet. Galenus se flumen isthuc et lapidem non invenisse, etiamsi naui parua totam Lyciam perlustravit: ait, se autem in caua Syria multos nigros lapides invenisse glebosos, qui igni impositi, exiguam flammam gignerent. Meminit hujus Nicander in Theriacis nempe suffitum hujus abigere venenata." There is also a good account of _Gagates_ (and of Succinum) by Langius, _Epistola_ LXXV., p. 454, of the work _Epistolarum medicinalium volumen tripartitum_ (Francofurti, 1589). [116] PAGE 47, LINE 39. Page 47, line 45. _Multi sunt authores moderni._--The modern authors who raised Gilbert's wrath by ignorantly copying out all the old tales about amber, jet, and loadstone, instead of investigating the facts, were, as he says at the beginning of the chapter, some theologians, and some physicians. He seems to have taken a special dislike to Albertus Magnus, to Puteanus (Du Puys), and to Levinus Lemnius. [117] PAGE 47, LINE 39. Page 47, line 46. _& gagate._--The editions of 1628 and 1633 both read _ex gagate_
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325  
326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   >>  



Top keywords:

Joannes

 
Dioscorides
 
invenisse
 

lapides

 
Gagates
 
dicitur
 

bituminis

 

gagate

 

glebosos

 

impositi


exiguam

 

nigros

 
perlustravit
 

editions

 
flammam
 

multos

 

gignerent

 
venenata
 

Succinum

 

account


abigere

 

suffitum

 

Meminit

 

Nicander

 

Theriacis

 
Lyciam
 

natali

 

nimirum

 
Lapide
 

Gagate


Lyciae

 

etiamsi

 

lapidem

 

Galenus

 
flumen
 

isthuc

 

Langius

 

copying

 

ignorantly

 
raised

Gilbert
 
beginning
 

investigating

 

loadstone

 

physicians

 

theologians

 

authors

 

modern

 
Francofurti
 

tripartitum