FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144  
145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   >>   >|  
sis, or from Genesis into the Avesta. History shows us clearly how Persian words and ideas could have found their way into such late works as Tobit, or even into the book of Daniel, whether he prospered in the reign of Darius, or in the reign of Cyrus the Persian. But how did Persians and Jews come in contact, previously to the age of Cyrus? Dr. Spiegel says that Zoroaster was born in Arran. This name is given by mediaeval Mohammedan writers to the plain washed by the Araxes, and was identified by Anquetil Duperron with the name Airyana vae_g_a, which the Zend-Avesta gives to the first created land of Ormuzd. The Parsis place this sacred country in the vicinity of Atropatene, and it is clearly meant as the northernmost country known to the author or authors of the Zend-Avesta. We think that Dr. Spiegel is right in defending the geographical position assigned by tradition to Airyana vae_g_a, against modern theories that would place it more eastward in the plain of Pamer, nor do we hesitate to admit that the name (Airyana vae_g_a, i. e. the seed of the Aryan) might have been changed into Arran. We likewise acknowledge the force of the arguments by which he shows that the books now called Zend-Avesta were composed in the Eastern, and not in the Western, provinces of the Persian monarchy, though we are hardly prepared to subscribe at once to his conclusion (p. 270) that, because Zoroaster is placed by the Avesta and by later traditions in Arran, or the Western provinces, he could not possibly be the author of the Avesta, a literary production which would appear to belong exclusively to the Eastern provinces. The very tradition to which Dr. Spiegel appeals represents Zoroaster as migrating from Arran to Balkh, to the court of Gustasp, the son of Lohrasp; and, as one tradition has as much value as another, we might well admit that the work of Zoroaster, as a religious teacher, began in Balkh, and from thence extended still further East. But admitting that Arran, the country washed by the Araxes, was the birthplace of Zoroaster, can we possibly follow Dr. Spiegel when he says, Arran seems to be identical with Haran, the birthplace of Abraham? Does he mean the names to be identical? Then how are the aspirate and the double r to be explained? how is it to be accounted for that the mediaeval corruption of Airyana vae_g_a, namely Arran, should appear in Genesis? And if the dissimilarity of the two names is waived, is it possible in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144  
145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Avesta

 

Zoroaster

 

Spiegel

 

Airyana

 

tradition

 

provinces

 

country

 

Persian

 
Western
 

mediaeval


birthplace

 

Eastern

 

author

 

possibly

 

washed

 

Araxes

 

identical

 
Genesis
 

literary

 

traditions


appeals
 

represents

 

migrating

 

exclusively

 

dissimilarity

 

belong

 

production

 

conclusion

 

prepared

 

subscribe


monarchy

 

waived

 

Gustasp

 
extended
 

aspirate

 
Abraham
 

admitting

 

follow

 

teacher

 

religious


Lohrasp

 
accounted
 
explained
 
double
 

corruption

 

modern

 
previously
 

contact

 

Persians

 

Mohammedan