FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160  
161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   >>   >|  
What is the form of our God? _A._ Our God has neither face nor form, colour nor shape, nor fixed place. There is no other like him. He is himself singly such a glory that we cannot, praise or describe him; nor our mind comprehend him. So far, no one could object to this Catechism, and it must be clear that the Dualism, which is generally mentioned as the distinguishing feature of the Persian religion--the belief in two Gods, Ormuzd, the principle of good, and Ahriman, the principle of evil--is not countenanced by the modern Parsis. Whether it exists in the Zend-Avesta is another question, which, however, cannot be discussed at present.[51] The Catechism continues: _Q._ What is our religion? _A._ Our religion is 'Worship of God.' _Q._ Whence did we receive our religion? _A._ God's true prophet--the true Zurthost (Zoroaster) Asphantaman Anoshirwan--brought the religion to us from God. Here it is curious to observe that not a single question is asked as to the claim of Zoroaster to be considered a true prophet. He is not treated as a divine being, nor even as the son of Ormuzd. Plato, indeed, speaks of Zoroaster as the son of Oromazes (Alc. i. p. 122 a), but this is a mistake, not countenanced, as far as we are aware, by any of the Parsi writings, whether ancient or modern. With the Parsis, Zoroaster is simply a wise man, a prophet favoured by God, and admitted into God's immediate presence; but all this, on his own showing only, and without any supernatural credentials, except some few miracles recorded of him in books of doubtful authority. This shows, at all events, how little the Parsis have been exposed to controversial discussions; for, as this is so weak a point in their system that it would have invited the attacks of every opponent, we may be sure that the Dustoors would have framed some argument in defence, if such defence had ever been needed. * * * * * The next extract from the Catechism treats of the canonical books: [Footnote 51: See page 140.] _Q._ What religion has our prophet brought us from God? _A._ The disciples of our prophet have recorded in several books that religion. Many of these books were destroyed during Alexander's conquest; the remainder of the books were preserved with great care and respect by the Sassanian kings. Of these again, the greater portion we
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160  
161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

religion

 
prophet
 

Zoroaster

 

Parsis

 

Catechism

 

brought

 
question
 
modern
 

Ormuzd

 
countenanced

defence

 

principle

 

recorded

 

presence

 

controversial

 

discussions

 

doubtful

 

supernatural

 
miracles
 

credentials


authority

 

showing

 

exposed

 

events

 
Alexander
 

conquest

 
remainder
 

destroyed

 

disciples

 
preserved

greater

 

portion

 

Sassanian

 

respect

 

opponent

 

Dustoors

 
attacks
 

system

 

invited

 

framed


argument

 

extract

 

treats

 

canonical

 
Footnote
 
needed
 

admitted

 

considered

 
distinguishing
 

feature