FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83  
84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   >>   >|  
institution; for it cannot, of course, be pretended that the United States constitution recognized, as constitutional, any state institution that did not constitutionally exist. Even if the constitution of the United States had _intended_ to recognize slavery, as a constitutional _state_ institution, such intended recognition would have failed of effect, and been legally void, because slavery then had no constitutional existence to be recognized. Suppose, for an illustration of this principle, that the constitution of the United States had, by implication, plainly taken it for granted that the state legislatures had power--derived from the _state_ constitutions--to order arbitrarily that infant children, or that men without the charge of crime, should be maimed--deprived, for instance, of a hand, a foot, or an eye. This intended recognition, on the part of the constitution of the United States, of the legality of such a practice, would obviously have failed of all legal effect--would have been mere surplussage--if it should appear, from an examination of the state constitutions themselves, that they had really conferred no such power upon the legislatures. And this principle applies with the same force to laws that would arbitrarily make men or children slaves, as to laws that should arbitrarily order them to be maimed or murdered. We might here safely rest the whole question--for no one, as has already been said, pretends that the constitution of the United States, by its own authority, created or authorized slavery as a new institution; but only that it intended to recognize it as one already established by authority of the state constitutions. This intended recognition--if there were any such--being founded on an error as to what the state constitutions really did authorize, necessarily falls to the ground, a defunct intention. We make a stand, then, at this point, and insist that the main question--the only material question--is already decided against slavery; and that it is of no consequence what recognition or sanction the constitution of the United States may have intended to extend to it. The constitution of the United States, at its adoption, certainly took effect upon, and made citizens of _all_ "the people of the United States," who were _not slaves_ under the state constitutions. No one can deny a proposition so self-evident as that. If, then, the _State_ constitutions, then existing, authorized n
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83  
84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
United
 

States

 

constitution

 
constitutions
 
intended
 
recognition
 

institution

 

slavery

 

effect

 

constitutional


question
 
arbitrarily
 

children

 

maimed

 

authorized

 

authority

 

slaves

 

principle

 

recognize

 

failed


recognized
 

legislatures

 

founded

 
authorize
 

proposition

 
necessarily
 
evident
 

existing

 

created

 

established


intention

 

people

 
extend
 
sanction
 

adoption

 
citizens
 

consequence

 

defunct

 

insist

 

decided


material

 

ground

 
derived
 

infant

 
granted
 
plainly
 

charge

 

instance

 
deprived
 

implication