FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276  
277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   >>   >|  
s a new genealogical tree. He states that the order of the animal series "is far from simple, that it is branching, and seems even to be composed of several distinct series;" though farther on (p. 456) he adds: "Je regarde _l'ordre de la production_ des animaux comme forme de deux series distinctes. "Ainsi, je soumets a la meditation des zoologistes l'ordre presume de la _formation_ des animaux, tel que l'exprime le tableau suivant:" In the matter of the origin of instinct, as in evolution in general, Lamarck appears to have laid the foundation on which Darwin's views, though he throws aside Lamarck's factors, must rest. The "inherited habit" theory is thus stated by Lamarck. Instinct, he claims, is not common to all animals, since the lowest forms, like plants, are entirely passive under the influences of the surrounding medium; they have no wants, are automata. "But animals with a nervous system have _wants_, _i.e._, they feel hunger, sexual desires, they desire to avoid pain or to seek pleasure, etc. To satisfy these wants they contract habits, which are gradually transformed into so many propensities which they can neither resist nor change. Hence arise habitual actions and special _propensities_, to which we give the name of _instinct_. "These propensities are inherited and become innate in the young, so that they act instinctively from the moment of birth. Thus the same habits and instincts are perpetuated from one generation to another, with no _notable_ variations, so long as the species does not suffer change in the circumstances essential to its mode of life." The same views are repeated in the introduction to the _Animaux sans Vertebres_ (1815), and again in 1820, in his last work, and do not need to be translated, as they are repetitions of his previously published views in the _Philosophie zoologique_. Unfortunately, to illustrate his thoughts on instinct Lamarck does not give us any examples, nor did he apparently observe to any great extent the habits of animals. In these days one cannot follow him in drawing a line--as regards the possession of instincts--between the lowest organisms, or Protozoa, and the groups provided with a nervous system. _Lamarck's meaning of the word "besoins," or wants or needs._--Lamarck's use of the word wants or needs (_besoins_) has, we think, been greatly misunderstood and at times caricatured or pronounced as "absurd." The
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276  
277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Lamarck

 

animals

 

instinct

 

propensities

 
habits
 

series

 

system

 

nervous

 
instincts
 

change


besoins
 
inherited
 

animaux

 

lowest

 

notable

 

circumstances

 

variations

 

essential

 

species

 

suffer


absurd
 

misunderstood

 

special

 

actions

 

habitual

 

innate

 
perpetuated
 
greatly
 

instinctively

 
moment

generation

 

follow

 
drawing
 

apparently

 

observe

 
extent
 
possession
 

caricatured

 

meaning

 

provided


organisms

 

Protozoa

 

groups

 
examples
 

Vertebres

 
repeated
 

introduction

 

Animaux

 

translated

 
resist