FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284  
285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   >>   >|  
election naturelle. Malheureusement, au lieu de poursuivre l'idee, Lamarck aussitot s'engage dans une autre voie_," etc. (_La Philosophie zoologique avant Darwin_, p. 81). [183] The expression "_sentiment interieur_" may be nearly equivalent to the "organic sense" of modern psychologists, but more probably corresponds to our word consciousness. [184] Lamarck's division of _Animaux sensibles_ comprises the insects, arachnids, crustacea, annelids, cirrhipedes, and molluscs. [185] Rather a strange view to take, as the brain of insects is now known to be nearly as complex as that of mammals. [186] Richerand, _Physiologie_. vol ii. p. 151. [187] "As all animals do not have the power of performing voluntary acts, so in like manner _instinct_ is not common to all animals: for those lacking the nervous system also want the organic sense, and can perform no instinctive acts. "These imperfect animals are entirely passive, they do nothing of themselves, they have no wants, and nature as regards them treats them as she does plants. But as they are irritable in their parts, the means which nature employs to maintain their existence enables them to execute movements which we call actions." It thus appears that Lamarck practically regards the lowest animals as automata, but we must remember that the line he draws between animals with and without a nervous system is an artificial one, as some of the forms which he supposed to be destitute of a nervous system are now known to possess one. [188] It should be noticed that Lamarck does not absolutely state that there are no variations whatever in instinct. His words are much less positive: "_Sans offrer de variation notable._" This dues not exclude the fact, discovered since his time, that instincts are more or less variable, thus affording grounds for Darwin's theory of the origin of new kinds of instincts from the "accidental variation of instincts." Professor James' otherwise excellent version of Lamarck's view is inexact and misleading when he makes Lamarck say that instincts are "perpetuated _without variation_ from one generation to another, so long as the outward conditions of existence remain the same" (_The Principles of Psychology_, vol. ii., p. 678, 1890). He leaves out the word notable. The italics are ours. Farther on (p. 337), it will be seen that Lamarck acknowledges that in birds and mammals instinct is variable. [189] It is interesting to compare with th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284  
285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Lamarck

 

animals

 

instincts

 

system

 
nervous
 

variation

 

instinct

 

mammals

 
variable
 

notable


nature
 
insects
 

existence

 

organic

 

Darwin

 

noticed

 

absolutely

 

italics

 

remember

 

Farther


leaves
 

variations

 

artificial

 

interesting

 

acknowledges

 

destitute

 
possess
 
supposed
 

compare

 
offrer

affording

 

misleading

 
grounds
 

automata

 

perpetuated

 
inexact
 
theory
 

accidental

 

Professor

 

excellent


version

 

origin

 

generation

 
Principles
 

remain

 
Psychology
 

conditions

 

outward

 

discovered

 
exclude