FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   >>  
ually compatible with Lamarck's theory of use and development. The wings of birds of great power of flight, the relations of insects to flowers, the claws of beasts of prey, are all cases in point." Professor J. A. Thomson's useful _Synthetic Summary of the Influence of the Environment upon the Organism_ (1887) takes for its text Spencer's aphorism, that the direct action of the medium was the primordial factor of organic evolution. Professor Geddes relies on the changes in the soil and climate to account for the origin of spines in plants. The botanist Sachs, in his _Physiology of Plants_ (1887), remarks: "A far greater portion of the phenomena of life are [is] called forth by external influences than one formerly ventured to assume." Certain botanists are now strong in the belief that the species of plants have originated through the direct influence of the environment. Of these the most outspoken is the Rev. Professor G. Henslow. His view is that self-adaptation, by response to the definite action of changed conditions of life, is the true origin of species. In 1894[253] he insisted, "_in the strictest sense of the term_, that natural selection is not wanted as an 'aid' or a 'means' in originating species." In a later paper[254] he reasserts that all variations are definite, that there are no indefinite variations, and that natural selection "can take no part in the origination of varieties." He quotes with approval the conclusion of Mr. Herbert Spencer in 1852, published "seven years before Darwin and Dr. Wallace superadded natural selection as an aid in the origin of species. He saw no necessity for anything beyond the natural power of change with adaptation; and I venture now to add my own testimony, based upon upwards of a quarter of a century's observations and experiments, which have convinced me that Mr. Spencer was right and Darwin was wrong. His words are as follows: 'The supporters of the development hypothesis can show ... that any existing species, animal or vegetable, when placed under conditions different from its previous ones, immediately begins to undergo certain changes of structure fitting it for the new conditions; ... that in the successive generations these changes continue until ultimately the new conditions become the natural ones.... They can show that throughout all organic nature there is at work a modifying influence of the kind they assign as th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   >>  



Top keywords:

natural

 

species

 

conditions

 

origin

 
Professor
 

selection

 

Spencer

 

adaptation

 
direct
 

action


influence
 
plants
 

organic

 

Darwin

 

development

 

definite

 

variations

 

Wallace

 

venture

 

superadded


reasserts
 

change

 

necessity

 

varieties

 

Herbert

 

quotes

 
approval
 
conclusion
 

published

 
indefinite

origination

 

fitting

 
successive
 

generations

 

continue

 
structure
 
previous
 

immediately

 

begins

 

undergo


ultimately

 

modifying

 

assign

 
nature
 

experiments

 
observations
 

convinced

 

century

 

quarter

 
testimony