FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455  
456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   >>  
The scholastic philosophers naturally held dualistic views resulting from their extreme devotion to formalism. This blind dualism found its natural consequence in the revolt of the Renaissance thinkers, Bruno and Paracelsus, who asserted the unity of mind and matter in all existence and were the precursors of the more intelligent monism of Leibnitz and the scientific metaphysics of his successors. The birth of modern physical science on the other hand in the investigations of Bacon and Descartes obscured the metaphysical issue by the predominance of the mechanical principles of natural philosophy. They attempted to explain the fundamental problems of existence by the unaided evidence of the new natural science. Thus Descartes maintained the absolute dualism of the _res cogitans_ and the _res extensa_. Spinoza realized the flaw in the division and preferred to postulate behind mind and matter a single substance (_unica substantia_) while Leibnitz explained the universe as a harmony of spiritual or semispiritual principles. Kant practically abandons the problem. He never really establishes a relation between pure reason and things-in-themselves (_Dinge an sich_), but rather seeks refuge in a dualism within consciousness, the transcendental and the empirical. Since Kant there are, therefore, two streams of dualism, dealing, one with the radical problem of the relation between mind and matter, the other with the relation between the pure rational and the empirical elements within consciousness. To the first problem there is one obvious and conclusive answer, namely that matter in itself is inherently unthinkable and comes within the vision of the mind only as an intellectual presentation. It follows that philosophy is in a sense both dualist and monist; it is a cosmic dualism inasmuch as it admits the possible existence of matter as a hypothesis, though it denies the possibility of any true knowledge of it, and is hence in regard of the only possible knowledge an idealistic monism. It is a self-destructive dualism, a confessedly one-sided monism, agnostic as to the fundamental problem. To the second problem there are two main answers, that of Associationism which denies to the mind any _a priori_ existence and asserts that sensation is the only source of knowledge, and that which admits the existence of both transcendental and empirical knowledge. DUALLA, one of the principal negro peoples of Cameroon estuary, West
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455  
456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   >>  



Top keywords:

dualism

 

matter

 

existence

 
problem
 

knowledge

 
natural
 

relation

 
empirical
 

monism

 
Descartes

admits

 
science
 
transcendental
 
consciousness
 

philosophy

 
fundamental
 

principles

 

Leibnitz

 

denies

 
sensation

asserts

 

Associationism

 
priori
 

streams

 

radical

 

rational

 

source

 

dealing

 

answers

 

refuge


Cameroon

 

estuary

 

peoples

 
elements
 

principal

 

DUALLA

 
presentation
 

possibility

 
intellectual
 

vision


cosmic

 
monist
 

things

 
dualist
 

regard

 

idealistic

 
conclusive
 

answer

 

obvious

 

confessedly