FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548  
549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   >>   >|  
nt, such as it may do to its approval of a treaty. In the words of an early opinion of the Attorney General: "The Senate cannot originate an appointment. Its constitutional action is confined to the simple affirmation or rejection of the President's nominations, and such nominations fail whenever it rejects them. The Senate may suggest conditions and limitations to the President, but it cannot vary those submitted by him, for no appointment can be made except on his nomination, agreed to without qualification or alteration."[298] This view is borne out by early opinion[299] as well as by the record of practice under the Constitution. When Senate Consent Is Complete Early in January, 1931 the Senate requested President Hoover to return its resolution notifying him that it advised and consented to certain nominations to the Federal Power Commission. In support of its action the Senate invoked a long-standing rule permitting a motion to reconsider a resolution confirming a nomination within "the next two days of actual executive session of the Senate" and the recall of the notification to the President of the confirmation. The nominees involved having meantime taken the oath of office and entered upon the discharge of their duties, the President responded with a refusal, saying: "I cannot admit the power in the Senate to encroach upon the executive functions by removal of a duly appointed executive officer under the guise of reconsideration of his nomination." The Senate thereupon voted to reconsider the nominations in question, again approving two of the nominees, but rejecting the third, against whom it instructed the District Attorney of the District of Columbia to institute _quo warranto_ proceedings in the Supreme Court of the District. In United States _v._ Smith[300] the Supreme Court overruled the proceedings on the ground that the Senate had never before attempted to apply its rule in the case of an appointee who had already been installed in office on the faith of the Senate's initial consent and notification to the President. In 1939 the late President Roosevelt rejected a similar demand by the Senate, action which was not challenged.[301] Section 3. The President * * * shall Commission all the Officers of the United States. Commissioning the Officer This, as applied in practice, does not mean that he is under constitutional obligation to commission those whose appointments have reached that st
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548  
549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Senate
 
President
 
nominations
 

executive

 

District

 
action
 
nomination
 

proceedings

 

practice

 
nominees

notification

 

reconsider

 

Commission

 
appointment
 

resolution

 

office

 

opinion

 

United

 

States

 

Attorney


constitutional
 

Supreme

 
instructed
 
warranto
 

institute

 

Columbia

 

reconsideration

 

functions

 

removal

 

appointed


encroach

 

officer

 

approving

 

rejecting

 

question

 

consent

 
Officers
 

Commissioning

 
Officer
 

challenged


Section

 

applied

 

appointments

 

reached

 

commission

 

obligation

 
demand
 

appointee

 
attempted
 

overruled