FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688  
689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   >>   >|  
ot own the children that are born of her. The husband exclusively controls them while living, and by his will he may, and often does, bequeath to somebody else the custody and care of them after his death. And the law which we men make enforces all this to-day. I trust that most of us are a great deal better than the law. If the wife of a man should suffer by an accident on a railroad, and suit should be brought to recover against the company for injury to her person, the suit brought by the husband would be upon the ground that his wife was his servant, and he had lost her service. If he did not, he could not recover. Mrs. STANTON.--Is such the law in case of a daughter? Mr. RIDDLE.--So far as that is concerned, where the daughter is a minor, it is the same as the case of a son a minor; but the wife is always the servant of the husband; she never graduates from him; she never becomes of age or arrives at the years of discretion. (Sotto voce.) If she had, she never would have entered into that condition. Miss Anthony would say the law pronounces the state of matrimony to be a condition of servitude for the wife in express terms. How does the XV. Amendment apply to her? Here is the previous condition of servitude provided for; and this XV. Amendment in its effect was but to enforce the XIV. in favor of persons held in a previous and, of course, a continuing condition of servitude. Does this really abrogate the servitude of the wife, and invoke in her favor the action of Congress? My distinguished brother, Butler, said this morning, that the clause relative to the previous condition of servitude applied only to widows. (Laughter.) But, ladies and gentlemen, aside from badinage, for the subject is too grave and too solemn, it comes back to this thing. The Constitution of the United States solemnly declares that every person born and naturalized in the United States, and within its jurisdiction, are citizens; and that no State shall pass, or enforce a law to abrogate the privileges and immunities of citizenship. We do not need any XVI. Amendment. We need only intelligent, firm decisive, and deciding--reasonably brave courts, and to have a question made and brought to their adjudication. I propose to offer Mrs. Griffing and two or three
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688  
689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

servitude

 

condition

 
brought
 

husband

 

previous

 

Amendment

 

abrogate

 

servant

 

recover

 

United


person

 
States
 
daughter
 

enforce

 
exclusively
 
widows
 

Laughter

 

applied

 

relative

 

morning


clause

 

ladies

 

Griffing

 

solemn

 

subject

 

badinage

 

gentlemen

 

Butler

 

brother

 
continuing

persons

 

effect

 
Congress
 

distinguished

 

action

 
invoke
 

controls

 
intelligent
 

decisive

 
deciding

adjudication

 

question

 

courts

 
citizenship
 

immunities

 

solemnly

 
declares
 

children

 

living

 
Constitution