FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706  
707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   >>   >|  
case; "_They who pay ought to choose whom they shall pay._" And the Lord Chief Justice seemed to have assented to that general proposition, as authority for the correlative proposition, that "women, when _sole_, had a right to vote." At all events, there is here the strongest possible evidence that in the reign of James I., the _feme sole_, being a freeholder of a country, or what is the same thing, of a county, of a city, or town, or borough, where, of custom, freeholders had the right to vote, not only had, but exercised the parliamentary franchise. If married, she could not vote in respect merely of her freehold, not because of the incapacities of coverture, but for this simple reason, that, by the act of marriage, which is an act of law, the title of the _feme sole_ freeholder becomes vested for life in the husband. The qualification to vote was not personal, but real; consequently, her right to vote became suspended as soon and for as long as she was married. I am bound to consider that the question as to what weight is due to the dictum of my Lord Coke is entirely disposed of by those cases from the reign of James I. and George II., and that the authority of the latter is unimpeached by any later authority, as the cases of Rex. _vs._ Stubles, and Regina _vs._ Aberavon, abundantly show. In Anstey's Notes on the New Reform Act of 1867, the authorities and precedents upon the right of women to vote in England are examined and summed up, and the author concludes: It is submitted that the weight of authority is very greatly in favor of the female right of suffrage. Indeed, the authority against it is contained in the short and hasty dictum of Lord Coke, referred to above. It was set down by him in his last and least authoritative institute, and it is certain that he has been followed neither by the great lawyers of his time nor by the judicature. The principles of the law in relation to the suffrage of females will be found in Coates _vs._ Lyle, Holt _vs._ Ingraham, and The King _vs._ Stubles, cases decided under the strict rules for the construction of statutes.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706  
707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

authority

 

freeholder

 
Stubles
 

proposition

 

suffrage

 

dictum

 

married

 

weight

 

examined

 

summed


submitted

 

concludes

 

author

 

greatly

 

authorities

 

Anstey

 
abundantly
 

Regina

 

Aberavon

 

precedents


Reform

 

England

 

females

 

relation

 
principles
 

judicature

 

Coates

 
strict
 

construction

 
statutes

decided
 
Ingraham
 

lawyers

 

referred

 

Indeed

 

contained

 

unimpeached

 
authoritative
 
institute
 

female


country

 
evidence
 
strongest
 

county

 

exercised

 

parliamentary

 
freeholders
 

custom

 

borough

 

events