FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708  
709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   >>   >|  
tled. The people of the United States determined this question by the XIV. Amendment to the Constitution, which declares that-- All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States, and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law. This amendment, after declaring who are citizens of the United States, and thus fixing but one grade of citizenship, which insures to all citizens alike all the privileges, immunities and rights which accrue to that condition, goes on in the same section and prohibits these privileges and immunities from abridgment by the States. Whatever these "privileges and immunities" are, they attach to the female citizen equally with the male. It is implied by this amendment that they are inherent, that they belong to citizenship as such, for they are not therein specified or enumerated. The majority of the committee hold that the privileges guaranteed by the XIV. Amendment do not refer to any other than the privilege embraced in section 2, of article 4, of the original text. The committee certainly did not duly consider this unjustified statement. Section 2, of article 4, provides for the privileges of "citizens of the _States_," while the first section of the XIV. Amendment protects the privileges of "_citizens of the United States_." The term citizens of the _States_ and citizens of the _United States_ are by no means convertible. A circuit court of the United States seems to hold a different view of this question from that stated by the committee. In the case of The Live Stock Association _vs._ Crescent City (1st Abbott, 396), Justice Bradley, of the Supreme Court of the United States, delivering the opinion, uses the following language in relation to the first clause of the XIV. Amendment: The new prohibition that "no State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708  
709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

United

 
citizens
 

privileges

 

immunities

 

Amendment

 

section

 

committee

 

article

 

person


citizenship

 

abridge

 

amendment

 

jurisdiction

 

question

 

enforce

 
people
 

protects

 

Section

 

statement


circuit

 

convertible

 

unjustified

 

privilege

 
embraced
 

Constitution

 

determined

 
original
 

delivering

 
opinion

Supreme
 
Justice
 

Bradley

 

prohibition

 

clause

 

language

 

relation

 
Abbott
 
stated
 

guaranteed


Crescent

 
Association
 
fixing
 

declaring

 

rights

 

insures

 
thereof
 

protection

 

liberty

 

property