FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689  
690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   >>   >|  
other ladies for registration, two or three months hence, when the time comes, here. (Applause.) If they are not registered, I propose to try the strength of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, composed of five intelligent gentlemen, and known not to be conservatives on some questions, whatever they will prove to be on this, and see whether they will issue a mandamus. If they won't, I will take the case to the Supreme Court of the United States, and one of the present judges of that Court, who is not pre-eminently in favor of what is called woman's rights, recently passed upon this XIV. Amendment. In the case of the "Live Stock Dealers" et al. _vs._ "The Crescent City Live Stock Company," in the circuit court of the United States, at New Orleans, Judge Bradley, of the Supreme Court of the United States, said of the XIV. Amendment: "It is possible that those who framed the article were not themselves aware of the far-reaching character of its terms. They may have had in mind but one particular phase of social and political wrong, which they desired to redress. Yet, if the amendment, as framed and expressed, does, in fact, bear a broader meaning, and does extend its protecting shield over those who were never thought of when it was conceived and put in form, and does reach such social evils which were never before prohibited by Constitutional Amendment, it is to be presumed that the American people, in giving it their imprimatur, understood what they were doing, and meant to decree what has, in fact, been done. "It embraces much more. The 'privileges and immunities' secured by the original Constitution were only such as each State gave to its own citizens. Each was prohibited from discriminating in favor of its own citizens, and against the citizens of other States. "But the XIV. Amendment prohibits any State from abridging the privileges or immunities of the citizens of the United States, whether its own citizens or any others. It not merely requires equality of privileges, but it demands that the privileges and immunities of all citizens shall be absolutely unabridged, unimpaired."--_Mrs. Bradwell's Legal
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689  
690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

citizens

 

States

 
privileges
 

United

 

Amendment

 

Supreme

 

immunities

 

prohibited

 

framed

 

social


American

 
people
 
presumed
 

giving

 
Constitutional
 
decree
 

imprimatur

 

understood

 

Applause

 

thought


shield

 

broader

 

extend

 

protecting

 

meaning

 

conceived

 

requires

 

equality

 

abridging

 
prohibits

demands

 

Bradwell

 
unimpaired
 

unabridged

 

absolutely

 
discriminating
 

secured

 
original
 

months

 
embraces

Constitution

 

ladies

 

registration

 
gentlemen
 

intelligent

 

Dealers

 
conservatives
 

Company

 

circuit

 
Crescent