FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2435   2436   2437   2438   2439   2440   2441   2442   2443   2444   2445   2446   2447   2448   2449   2450   2451   2452   2453   2454   2455   2456   2457   2458   2459  
2460   2461   2462   2463   2464   2465   2466   2467   2468   2469   2470   2471   2472   2473   2474   2475   2476   2477   2478   2479   2480   2481   2482   2483   2484   >>   >|  
eil was _rended_." --_Whittier's Moll Pitcher_. "Mortal, my message is for thee; thy chain to earth is _rended_; I bear thee to eternity; prepare! thy course is ended." --_The Amulet_. "Come as the winds come, when forests are _rended_." --_Sir W. Scott_. "The hunger pangs her sons which rended." --NEW QUARTERLY REVIEW: _Examiner_, No. 119. [285] We find now and then an instance in which _gainsay_ is made regular: as, "It can neither be _rivalled_ nor _gainsayed_."--_Chapman's Sermons to Presbyterians_, p. 36. Perhaps it would be as well to follow Webster here, in writing _rivaled_ with one _l_: and the analogy of the simple verb _say_, in forming this compound irregularly, _gainsaid_. Usage warrants the latter, however, better than the former. [286] "Shoe, _shoed_ or shod, shoeing, _shoed_ or shod."--_Old Gram., by W. Ward_, p. 64; and _Fowle's True English Gram._, p. 46. [287] "A. Murray has rejected _sung_ as the _Preterite_, and L. Murray has rejected _sang_. Each _Preterite_, however, rests on good authority. The same observation may be made, respecting _sank_ and _sunk_. Respecting the _preterites_ which have _a_ or _u_, as _slang_, or _slung, sank_, or _sunk_, it would be better were the former only to be used, as the _Preterite_ and Participle would thus be discriminated."--_Dr. Crombie, on Etymology and Syntax_, p. 199. The _preterits_ which this critic thus prefers, are _rang, sang, stung, sprang, swang, sank, shrank, slank, stank, swam_, and _span_ for _spun_. In respect to them all, I think he makes an ill choice. According to his own showing, _fling, string_, and _sting_, always make the preterit and the participle alike; and this is the obvious tendency of the language, in all these words. I reject _slang_ and _span_, as derivatives from _sling_ and _spin_; because, in such a sense, they are obsolete, and the words have other uses. Lindley Murray, _in his early editions_, rejected _sang, sank, slang, swang, shrank, slank, stank_, and _span_; and, at the same time, preferred _rang, sprang_, and _swam_, to _rung, sprung_, and _swum_. In his later copies, he gave the preference to the _u_, in all these words; but restored _sang_ and _sank_, which Crombie names above, still omitting the other six, which did not happen to be mentioned to him. [288] _Sate_ for the preterit of _sit_, and _sitten_ for the perfect participle, are, in my opinion, obsolet
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2435   2436   2437   2438   2439   2440   2441   2442   2443   2444   2445   2446   2447   2448   2449   2450   2451   2452   2453   2454   2455   2456   2457   2458   2459  
2460   2461   2462   2463   2464   2465   2466   2467   2468   2469   2470   2471   2472   2473   2474   2475   2476   2477   2478   2479   2480   2481   2482   2483   2484   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

rended

 

Murray

 

rejected

 

Preterite

 

participle

 
preterit
 

sprang

 

Crombie

 

shrank

 

choice


preterits

 

critic

 
prefers
 

Syntax

 
Participle
 

discriminated

 

Etymology

 
respect
 
obvious
 

restored


preference

 

sprung

 

copies

 

omitting

 

sitten

 

perfect

 
opinion
 
obsolet
 

happen

 

mentioned


preferred

 

tendency

 

language

 

reject

 
derivatives
 

showing

 

string

 
Lindley
 

editions

 

obsolete


According

 

Examiner

 
REVIEW
 

QUARTERLY

 

rivalled

 

gainsayed

 

Chapman

 

instance

 

gainsay

 

regular