FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347  
348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   >>   >|  
own merits. The PRESIDENT:--The question will be taken upon each section of the substitute proposed. Mr. JAMES:--I propose the following as a substitute for the first section of the amendment offered by Mr. HITCHCOCK. It is, I believe, the same as that proposed in Congress by the Committee of Thirteen. I understand, also, that the Committee of the House of Representatives are about to substitute it for what is known as the ADAMS Proposition. We all have the same purpose in view, to negative in express terms the right of Congress to interfere with the institution of slavery within the States. I present the amendment because I think it expresses the purpose in better language. SECTION 1. No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State. Mr. CHASE:--This amendment would be limited in its application to the States. Congress would still have power in this respect over Territories. Mr. GUTHRIE:--The report of the committee has been agreed upon after much discussion, and printed. We all understand it, and I hope we shall adhere to it without any alteration. If we begin to adopt these amendments no one can tell where they will carry us. Mr. JAMES:--My proposition is offered as an amendment to that offered by Mr. HITCHCOCK. Mr. GUTHRIE:--So I understand; but his amendment is proposed as a substitute for the third section of the article reported by the committee. I object to the whole of it. Mr. RANDOLPH:--Do I understand that the question now is upon substituting Mr. HITCHCOCK'S amendment for the committee's report. Mr. JAMES:--No. It is upon substituting my proposition for the first section of Mr. HITCHCOCK'S amendment. The vote upon the amendment offered by Mr. JAMES resulted as follows: AYES.--Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, and Indiana--7. NOES.--Rhode Island, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri, Ohio, Illinois, and Kansas--13. And the amendment was lost. Mr. WOOD:--I must enter my dissent from the vote of Illinois. Mr. FOWLER:--I have an amendment which I offer to the substitute proposed by Mr. HITCHCOCK-- Mr. RANDOLPH:--I object t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347  
348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

amendment

 
substitute
 
HITCHCOCK
 

section

 
Congress
 
understand
 

offered

 

proposed

 

committee

 

interfere


purpose

 

States

 
substituting
 

proposition

 
RANDOLPH
 

report

 

object

 
GUTHRIE
 

question

 

Illinois


Committee

 

dissent

 

article

 

Virginia

 

reported

 
Carolina
 

FOWLER

 

amendments

 
Maryland
 

Connecticut


Massachusetts

 

Missouri

 

Vermont

 

Indiana

 
Tennessee
 

Jersey

 

Kentucky

 

Island

 

Hampshire

 
resulted

Delaware
 
Pennsylvania
 

Kansas

 

institution

 

slavery

 

express

 

negative

 

present

 
SECTION
 

language