FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367  
368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   >>   >|  
t not for traffic or sale." Mr. TUCK:--I am in favor of the amendment proposed by the gentleman from Pennsylvania. It is not proper or best to encumber these propositions with amendments that are not necessary. Mr. LOGAN:--Every State has the right to regulate transit within its own limits to suit itself. The proposed amendment gives no rights except such as are expressly named: "a right, during transportation, of touching at the ports, and of landing in case of distress." The right of the State to regulate transit is left unimpaired. Mr. HOWARD:--There is one principle of law which will settle this question at once: property that is held under State laws must be transferred by the operation of State laws alone. Slaves are held and transferred by the specific laws of the States in which they are held. Mr. PALMER:--The right of sale cannot possibly arise out of the right to touch during transportation at a port, or the right to land in case of distress. I cannot see the slightest occasion or necessity for the adoption of Mr. McCURDY'S amendment. Mr. McCURDY'S amendment was rejected by the following vote: AYES.--Maine, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, Indiana, and Iowa--7. NOES.--New Hampshire, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri, Ohio, Illinois, and Kansas--14. Mr. POLLOCK'S amendment was then adopted without a division. Mr. VANDEVER:--I wish to propose an amendment by way of proviso: "_Provided_ nothing herein contained shall be so construed as to prevent any State from prohibiting the introduction as merchandise of persons held to service or labor, or to prevent such State from prohibiting the transit of persons so held to service or labor through its limits." Mr. FIELD:--This does not cover Mr. McCURDY'S proposition at all. Is there any secret purpose here to bring into the Constitution a provision which will permit the sale of slaves in free States? If there is not, why not say plainly that the States shall have the exclusive right to determine who shall and who shall not cross its borders, and what shall be the subject of sale or traffic within them? Mr. GUTHRIE:--The States have all the powers which are not expressly delegated under the Constitution to be exercised by Congress. Congress has no power, except such as are expressly conferred upo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367  
368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

amendment

 
States
 
transit
 

expressly

 
McCURDY
 
transportation
 

prohibiting

 

Pennsylvania

 

service

 

persons


proposed

 

Constitution

 
distress
 

transferred

 
traffic
 

regulate

 

prevent

 
Congress
 

limits

 

introduction


construed

 

contained

 

VANDEVER

 

Illinois

 

Kansas

 
POLLOCK
 

Missouri

 

Carolina

 
Tennessee
 

Kentucky


adopted

 

proviso

 

Provided

 

propose

 
division
 

provision

 

borders

 

determine

 

exclusive

 
plainly

subject
 
conferred
 

exercised

 

delegated

 

GUTHRIE

 

powers

 

proposition

 

secret

 
purpose
 

permit