FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376  
377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   >>   >|  
awful assemblies at the North. Although such may have occurred in one or two sections only, generally the provisions of the fugitive slave law have been observed and carried out. The whole subject is very distasteful to the North. I think if we keep it out of the article, and in its place secure that respect for the privileges of citizens in the various States, to which, indeed, under the Constitution, they are entitled, we shall do much better. Mr. LOGAN:--There are various reasons peculiar to some of the free States why this provision should not be adopted. The laws of several of the Western States do not recognize negroes as citizens. I move to amend the amendment proposed by my colleague, by inserting the words "free white" before the word "citizens." The amendment offered by Mr. LOGAN was adopted by the following vote: AYES.--New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana, and Illinois--10. NOES.--Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, and Iowa--8. Mr. ORTH, of Indiana, dissented from the vote of his State. Mr. TURNER:--I suppose the purpose of my colleague has been attained. If there is a delegation willing to make such a distinction in the Constitution, they will, of course, support the amendment as it is now amended. The vote was then taken upon the amendment, as amended, with the following result: AYES.--None. NOES.--Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri, Ohio, and Indiana--18. Mr. WILMOT:--If the seventh section is adopted, I think the North should have some compensation therefor. I think citizens of the North have as much occasion for complaint on account of the action of mobs and riotous assemblies in the slave States, as the slave States have of the occurrence of those mobs and assemblies in the North. I therefore move the following as an addition to the seventh section: "And Congress shall farther provide by law, that the United States shall make full compensation to a citizen of any State, who, in any other State, shall suffer by reason of violence or intimidation from mobs and riotous assemblies, in his person or property, or in the deprivation, by violence,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376  
377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

assemblies

 
citizens
 

amendment

 

adopted

 

Indiana

 

compensation

 

Virginia

 

Carolina

 

Constitution


Delaware

 
amended
 
Jersey
 

Pennsylvania

 
Maryland
 

seventh

 

Tennessee

 

section

 

Island

 

Connecticut


violence

 

colleague

 

Kentucky

 

riotous

 
Massachusetts
 

Hampshire

 
Vermont
 

distinction

 

delegation

 

purpose


attained

 
deprivation
 

intimidation

 

addition

 

action

 
occurrence
 

Congress

 
farther
 

suffer

 

citizen


provide

 

United

 
account
 

person

 

result

 
property
 

Missouri

 
occasion
 

complaint

 

therefor