he committee's section
it might act upon the subject of slavery. I understand that the
purpose of the committee was to prevent Congress from abolishing
slavery in the Territories, but not to prevent the Territorial
Legislature from acting in aid of it. My amendment will secure slavery
from all interference. That is what we want.
Mr. GUTHRIE:--The first section of the report covers this. The
amendment, I think, is unnecessary.
Mr. SEDDON:--I think the first section, properly construed, would
prevent the Territorial Legislature from enacting a law in aid of
slavery, even if the whole people of the Territory desired it.
Mr. GUTHRIE:--I do not desire to go over these questions again. If the
Conference intends to come to any conclusion at all, I hope it will
vote down all these amendments.
Mr. SEDDON:--I call for a vote by States.
Mr. WOOD:--I move that the amendment be laid on the table.
Mr. BALDWIN:--Which motion is in order--mine or that of the gentleman
from Virginia?
The PRESIDENT:--The gentleman from Ohio having withdrawn his
amendment, the proposal of the gentleman from Connecticut is no longer
before the Conference. The question is upon the motion of the
gentleman from Virginia to amend the third section of the article
reported by the committee.
The vote upon the amendment proposed by Mr. SEDDON resulted as
follows:
AYES.--Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee,
Kentucky, and Missouri--6.
NOES.--Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode
Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,
Delaware, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, and Kentucky--14.
And the amendment was not adopted.
Mr. SEDDON:--I now move to amend the third section reported by the
committee, by striking out the words "City of Washington," and
inserting in their place the words "District of Columbia."
The motion of Mr. SEDDON was agreed to without a division.
Mr. WICKLIFFE:--I do not see why this privilege of bringing their
slaves into the District should be limited to members of Congress.
Mr. GUTHRIE:--It is not. The expression is "representatives and
_others_."
Mr. SEDDON:--I now propose to amend the same section by inserting
after the words "without the consent of Maryland" the words "and
Virginia." I think slavery ought not to be destroyed in the District
of Columbia without the consent both of Maryland and Virginia. If
there is any reason for requiring the consent of one
|